BUD VARIATION" IN" THE WASHINGTON NAVEL ORANGE. 
31 
Table II. — Summarized statement of the average annual production of 151 Washington 
Navel orange trees for which detailed performance records were obtained for six years , 
1910 to 1915, inclusive— Continued. 
Rank. 
61. 
62. 
63. 
64. 
65. 
66. 
67. 
68. 
(19. 
70. 
71. 
72. 
73. 
-74. 
75. 
76. 
77. 
78. 
79. 
80. 
81. 
82. 
83. 
84. 
85. 
86. 
87. 
88. 
89. 
90. 
91. 
92. 
93. 
94. 
95. 
96. 
97. 
98. 
99. 
100 
101 
102 
103 
104 
105 
Tree desig- 
nation. 
10:1-28- 3 
10:1-28-10 
4-21-31 
4-29- 6 
.10:1-30- 1 
10:1-31- 1 
10:1-31- 2 
4-21-30 
*10:1-31- 9 
10:1-30- 8 
10:1-28- 2 
4-17-34 
10:1-32-11 
10:1-32- 5 
10:1-32- 8 
4-31- 2 
10:1-31- 3 
10:1-31- 8 
3-14- 3 
*10:l-28- 1 
4-23-28 
10:1-31-11 
7:1-65-21 
10:1-32- 2 
6:1-70- 9 
10:1-28-11 
10:1-29- 5 
7:1-65-22 
4-30- 5 
*10:l-32- 1 
10:1-29- 1 
10:2- 7-13 
4- 3- 6 
10:1-30-4 
*10:l-29- 9 
4-31- 3 
10:1-30- 6 
4-17-16 
*4-18- 1 
7:1-65- 8 
10:1-28- 7 
*7: 1-65-10 
7:1-69- 6 
7:1-65-13 
*7: 1-69-11 
10:1-30-11 
7:1-69-13 
Annual crop production, 
6-year average. 
Weight 
Pounds 
229.5 
227.6 
224. 6 
224.0 
223. 9 
223.8 
223.3 
222.9 
220.7 
218.7 
218.3 
217.5 
217.4 
216.1 
215. 9 
214.4 
214.1 
211.0 
211.0 
209.5 
209.4 
208.3 
207.6 
207.1 
205.6 
204.4 
202.4 
201.9 
201.3 
201.2 
197.0 
195.5 
193.0 
192.7 
188.0 
187.3 
186.3 
183.6 
176.7 
173.7 
173.7 
172.8 
164.4 
162.6 
161.3 
153.8 
152.1 
Num- 
ber. 
4SS 
510 
484 
451 
489 
487 
462 
480 
435 
454 
468 
460 
451 
433 
449 
454 
438 
433 
434 
451 
465 
479 
548 
425 
476 
458 
430 
560 
393 
435 
427 
419 
344 
388 
379 
402 
369 
348 
3L6 
468 
339 
431 
450 
442 
442 
344 
405 
Or- 
chard 
P.ct. 
82.6 
84.6 
79.8 
82.2 
85.5 
83.8 
81.6 
■8-1.6 
83.4 
83.6 
83.2 
79.6 
85!4 
83.6 
78.6 
85-0 
83.8 
85.6 
82.0 
79.6 
82.6 
80.0 
83.0 
86.0 
85.2 
85.2 
80.4 
80.6 
82.2 
83.6 
78.6 
82.6 
83.0 
85.0 
77.2 
83.6 
79.2 
83.2 
84.8 
83.6 
81.6 
76.6 
78-6 
81.8 
84.2 
84.8 
Vari- 
able 
fruits. 
P.ct. 
0.72 
.69 
.52 
1.55 
.37 
.84 
.42 
2.52 
.77 
.85 
1.11 
.86 
1.00 
.55 
.78 
.21 
1.48 
.47 
.59 
1.27 
.64 
1.36 
.36 
.44 
.64 
.40 
1.69 
.81 
.57 
1.17 
.43 
1.71 
1.16 
.40 
.45 
.52 
1.98 
.25 
Rank. 
106 
107 
los 
109 
IK) 
111 
112 
113 
111 
115 
116 
117 
118 
119 
120 
121 
122 
123 
124 
125 
126 
127 
128 
129 
130 
131 
132 
133 
134 
135 
136 
137 
138 
139 
140 
141 
142 
143 
144 
145 
146 
147 
148 
149 
150 
151 
Tree desig- 
nation. 
1-69- 8 
1-65- 6 
1-66-11 
1-69-12 
1-65- 7 
1-65-15 
1-65-14 
1-66- 9 
1-66-13 
1-65- 9 
1-69-15 
1-69-10 
1-67-11 
1-66-15 
1-66-14 
1-66- 6 
1-69-14 
1-68-11 
1-69- 7 
1-67-14 
1-65-11 
1-69- 9 
1-66- 7 
1-67-10 
1-67-15 
1-68- 7 
1-66- 8 
1-65-12 
1-68-15 
1-68- 6 
1-68-13 
1-67-12 
1-68- 9 
1-67- 8 
1-67- 7 
1-68-10 
1-67- 9 
1-67- 6 
1-68-14 
1-68- 8 
1-68-12 
1-66-12 
1-67 43 
1-66-10 
1-6.5-23 
1-52- 3 
Annual crop production, 
6-year average. 
Weight. 
Pounds, 
150.6 
149.8 
148.1 
145.4 
144.0 
143.3 
143.1 
136.8 
136. 4 
134.7 
131.5 
128.6 
127.3 
126.4 
122.6 
119.4 
118.7 
118.6 
116.3 
113.0 
112.0 
111.6 
111.5 
111.4 
110.1 
108.0 
106.4 
105.6 
105. 2 
104.4 
100.8 
100.2 
100.2 
99.6 
98.2 
92.5 
85.5 
84.3 
83.1 
78.5 
76.5 
72.6 
69.5 
68.6 
62.7 
55.8 
Num- 
ber. 
Or- 
chard 
grade. 
444 
384 
404 
426 
371 
371 
359 
376 
345 
363 
351 
364 
365 
333 
349 
325 
312 
328 
329 
317 
307 
327 
291 
317 
318 
319 
308 
293 
284 
297 
284 
272 
308 
292 
278 
267 
252 
243 
239 
217 
224 
198 
198 
180 
178 
119 
P.ct. 
80.3 
79.6 
76.6 
79.6 
80.4 
81.6 
82.4 
83.2 
80.2 
82.0 
80.2 
82.0 
84.0 
82.2 
79.4 
76.4 
79.6 
76.8 
72.6 
82.3 
80.0 
75.2 
79.8 
79.0 
78.8 
73.4 
76.3 
81.6 
78.3 
74.6 
78.2 
71.8 
74.8 
78.6 
77.4 
75.8 
69.6 
80.8 
73.0 
72.6 
74.0 
65.2 
76.3 
73.6 
75.2 
63.0 
Vari- 
able 
fruits. 
P.ct. 
0.90 
.52 
.32 
1.24 
.54 
.49 
1.06 
.61 
1.30 
.36 
.28 
1.10 
.36 
.84 
.72 
.92 
.48 
.85 
1.15 
.57 
.81 
1.38 
.69 
.41 
.72 
.63 
.42 
.85 
1.51 
1.11 
.46 
.11 
1.47 
.51 
.90 
.75 
3.37 
1.44 
.63 
.37 
.58 
2.52 
.40 
.17 
1.40 
1.68 
Table II shows not only the great variations in the average quan- 
tity of fruit produced by different individual trees, but also the per- 
centages of the Orchard grade, or first-grade, fruit. The number of 
variable fruits shows the variations in the uniformity of the fruit. 
To indicate more fully and accurately the real variations between 
the different trees and their true relative values to the investigator 
and the orchardist, it is necessary to consider the yearly record of 
each tree. 
The complete performance records of 35 representative trees of the 
151 on which data have been secured for six years are given in Table 
III. . This list was made by selecting within each strain those trees 
whose average total crops were nearest the multiples of 10 pounds. 
This basis was adopted in order to remove all chance for any personal 
bias in the selection of the trees. 
