Graff: Philippine Fungi 
267 
throughout the tropics. The fungi of this expedition were de- 
termined by Leveille, who published diagnoses of several new 
species in a previously cited article.'* This publication contains a 
list of ten fungi which were collected during the stay at Manila. 
All of these are previously described species. In the same 
volume of the “Voyage” are published the “Algae” and 
“ Lichens ” by Montagne, in which he mentions three lichens 
from the vicinity of Manila. 
1851 
Calzado, P. Fr. Antonio L. A. Fragmentos de Algunas Plantas 
de Filipinas, pp. 115-116. 
This little publication contains notes on a number of plants 
not included by Blanco in his “ Flora de Filipinas.” Nine 
species of Basidiomycetes are listed and followed by the state- 
ment that, “ Hay otras muchas especies y variedades de hongos 
que seria largo enumerar.” One of the nine species, Meruliiis 
conicus, is described as a new species. This, from the meagre 
Spanish description accompanying it, one would be inclined to 
place as a Coprimts. 
1862 
Curtis, ]\I. A. and Berkeley, 1\I. J. “ Fungi,” in the Wilkes 
United States Exploring Expedition 17 : 195-202. 
As far as fungi are concerned, this paper makes almost no 
mention of the Philippines. But one species, Polyporus brim- 
neolus Berk., is given as having been collected in the Islands. 
1878 
Berkeley, M. J. Enumeration of the Fungi collected during 
the Expedition of H. M. S. “ Challenger,” 1874-1875. (Third 
Notice.) ' Journ. Linn. Soc. Bot. 16: 38-54. 
These fungi were collected in the southern part of the Archi- 
pelago, from Camiguin, JMalanipa, and Malamon, between Janu- 
ary 30th and February 4, 1875. There are here listed thirty 
Philippine species of which twenty-nine are Basidiomycetes and 
one an Ascomycete. Two numbers from “ Little Ke ” are in- 
* Ann. Sci. Nat. Bot. Ill, 3 (1844) 167-221. 
