308 Proceedings of Royal Society of Edinburgh. [sess. 
Too much, reliance, however, cannot be placed on this figure. 
It only gives an approximate result, seeing that the glabella and 
the median frontal outline were absent in the Largs specimen, and 
that the inion in the photographs of the other two specimens 
could not be determined with absolute certainty. It may be well 
to mention that the Persley and Stoneywood crania were not 
chosen for the purpose of this comparison because, of Dr Bryce’s 
Fig. 6. — Superimposed cranial outlines. 
Photograph, Largs specimen (Munro). 
Continuous line, Persley cranium (Low). 
Dotted outline, Stoneywood cranium (Low). 
series, they seemed to present the greatest degree of similarity to 
the Largs cranium, but because it appeared to me that in these 
photographs I could determine with the best chance of accuracy 
the position of the inion. 
The fragment of upper jaw belonging to the Largs cranium 
calls for no special remark. The sockets show that all the molar 
teeth had been in place ; and further, that the incisor teeth had 
been implanted vertically. 
In the case of the lower jaw, the only part absent is the right 
