NEIGHBOURHOOD OF NORWICH ; AND GENUS GLYPTA, GR. G7 
1837, gave thirteen species, all described by Gravenhorst in his 
‘ Ichneumonologi® Europe;e ; ’ and of these thirteen, Curtis had 
marked seven of them as doubtfully British. 
Desvignes, in his ‘Catalogue of Ichneumons in the British 
Museum,’ published in 185G, gives eighteen species, seven of which 
were new, and are there described by him; and omits two of 
the species in Curtis’s list — G. mbcomuta and G. fronticornis : 
mbcomuta does not appear to have been taken since Gravenhorst 
described it ; and no one, except Curtis, that I know of has ever 
quoted it. Gravenhorst says it is like G. iwnsuratur ; and it may 
possibly have been only a variety of that species. 
The Rev. T. A. Marshall, in his ‘Catalogue of British Ichneumons,’ 
published in 1872, gives twenty species, still omitting mbcomuta , 
and adding to Desvigues’ list G. fronticornis and resinano . 
I have still further increased the list to thirty-four species, of which 
seven are Continental ; the other seven species were new to 
science, which I have described and named. G. fronticornis, lirst 
appeared for certain in the Rev. T. A. Marshall’s list, I do not feel 
at all sure that it has any right to a place in the British list. 
There is another species, G. doiu/ata, H., which is very like 
G. fronticornis, Gr. Both answer very well to Gravenliorst’s 
description, but ehmgata has the sides of head behind the eyes 
almost parallel, while front icorni s has the sides very much 
converging towards the neck. I have taken elongaia at Brundall, 
and have had bred specimens sent to me, and have, 1 believe, 
seen it elsewhere ; but I have never seen a specimen of the true 
fronticornis. I have retained it in my table, but question its 
right to be there as a British species. 
Three species are here recorded as British for the first time; viz., 
G. cicatricosa . , R, sent to me to name by the Rev. E. Ah Bloomfield 
of Guest ling Rectory, Hastings ; and the others are new 
species bred, and kindly given to me, by Mr. G. Elisha and 
Mr. W. H. B. Fletcher — G. rubicunda , Ns., and annulate i, Ns. 
Mr. Atmore has bred this year both sexes of G. faripes, the 
female of which was previously unknown. 
Professor Thomsen says that G. consimilis, II., is the same 
as G. resinanen, Rtz. This may be so as far as the female is 
concerned ; but Holmgren says the legs are red, and makes no 
mention of tho black coxai of the male, which I think he 
v 2 
