RANGE OF BROODS IN ORDER OF FUTURE APPEARANCKS. 31 
Georgia.— Cobb (f), Coweta (f), Dekalb f), Gwinnett f), Iferiwethei 
Newton ( ?). 
Illinois. — Alexander, Jackson, Macoupin, Madison, Perry, Like. Randolph, Scott, 
Union, Washington (ft). 
Indiana. — Posey (??)•' 
Kentucky. — Barren (f), Graves, Trigg. 
Louisiana. — Bossier, Caldwell, Ea>t Carroll, Franklin. Madison, Morehouse. Bed 
River, Richland, Washington, West Carroll. 
Mississippi. — Alcorn, Amite. Bolivar, Calhoun, Carroll, Claiborne, Coahoma, Copiah, 
De Soto, Franklin, Hinds (and adjoining counties;, Issaojiena, Jasper, Lafayette, 
Lawrence, Lincoln, Madison. Marshall, Montgomery, Newton. Panola, Quitman, 
Rankin | and adjoining counties), Scott, Simpson, Smith, Tate, Tishomingo, Webster. 
Fig. 5.— Map showing distribution of Brood XIX. 1888 
Missouri. — Audrain, Boone, Cape Giradeau, Christian, Dade, Dallas. Douglas, Gas- 
conade, Greene, Hickory, Jefferson, Johnson, Knox, Lawrence | f), New Madrid, 
Osage, Pettis, Perry, Polk, St. Charles. St. Louis, Scott. Taney. Texas. Warren, 
Washington, Webster. 
Tennessee. — Benton, Carroll, Chester, Crockett, Davidson, Decatur, Dickson, 1 
Fayette, Gibson, Hardeman, Haywood. Henderson. Humphreys, Lake. Lauderdale. 
McN'airy, Madison, Maury, Obion, Robertson, Shelby, Tipton. Weakley.-' 
Brood XIX. — 8eptendedm — 1899. Fig. 5. 
This brood was founded by Professor Riley in 1868 on I>r. Smith's 
register, in which it is recorded from 1 7*. >7 to L848 as occurring in cer- 
tain counties in western New York. 
1 Confirmed this vein- 1898 
• \ summary of the records for 1896 is appended to this bulletin. 
20110—2*0.14 3 
