^ HROOD Vlir SKPTENDECIM 191T. 
47 
this ])r()()(l is not vorv important and is (li^■i(lo(l into two sections hy 
tJK^ following: brood. A^III. 
Tlic confirniations of \]\c occurrcMicc of lliis hrood in New York in 
later years are rc^ported in Bulletin No. S, old seri(\s, l)i\ision of 
luitoniolo^xy- 1 1h' locali(i(vs in Pennsylvauiu and AVest ^'irl!;iniJl are 
hased on lat(>r l)i\isional rcM-ords. 
The distribution, by States and counties, is as follows: 
Xkw Vohk. Cayu^'a, l,i\ in^sfoii, Madison, Monroe, ( )noii(la.ua, ( )nlario, Wyoinin^'. 
Van-s. 
I'ennsylv.wia. — AUogheny, ^^■ashino;(o^. 
West Virginia. — Summers?. 
Fig. 10.— Map showing distribution of Brood \'J 1, IDlti. 
Brood YlU—Seplendeciin— 1917. (Fig. 11.) 
This is Fitch's second brood wliicli he described as oceurrini: in 
western New York, western Pennsylvania, and eastern Oliio, and is 
ikood XIV of Walsh-Riley, and XX of liiley. Dr. G. B. Sniitli also 
gives valuable data relative to its appearance and distribution. 
It is one of the smaller broods and did not attract much attention 
on its appearance in 1883, but records of a num])er of additional 
swarms were obtained on the occasion of its appearance in 1900. 
The main territory covered b}^ it is a rather compact one, Mng hi 
western Pennsylvania, eastern Ohio, and the panhandle of AVest Vir- 
ginia. The swarms in the area thus included probably originated 
