imoon XV SKPTKXDia^IM 1007. 
Gl 
;iro in Dutclioss juul Sai-atoi^a counties, N. V. All lli(> [-('cords from 
bulletin IS anM'cproduccd hclow, \\i( h the cxccplion of tlic icport 
from Indian TcM-ritoi'v, which falls distinct ly within tli(> l.'J-Ncar lines. 
and has been transferred to J^rood XXIX. 
This ])i\)od is re])resentod by t lu^ colony appeai'iiiL!: at TiNoli, 
Dutchess County, and (lalway, Saratoi^a County, .\ . V., in dune. 
1890, as recorded by Prof. J. A. Lintner in his Seventh U(>|)ort, 
paiTCs 297-301. Mr. Davis records the occurrence of scatterin^^ 
individuals tlu^ same yeai" on Staten Island. In a leltei- of dun(> 2, 
1S90, l*i-of. J. B. Smith. \(>w Brunswick, X. d.. ivporls thai tlie 
Fit;. IS. -Miip showiii},' distribution of Brood XV, 1907. 
periodical Cicada liad ])een taken by several X^ewark (Essex County), 
collectors, and had also been observed at Anglesea, Cape May 
County. 
Another record wliich ])er]ia])s a])plies to this brood is (^iveii by 
Mr. I. X. Smith, Scotland Neck, Halifax County, N. C, in letter of 
dune 22, 1S85. lie reports that his " lirst recollection of the locust 
was about the year 1S;39 or ]S4(), when the whole of the white-oak 
lands were filled with them. * * ''= In 1X55 or 1S,^)() they a|)|)ear(Ml 
airain. but nothiuii; to compai'c with the period (ii'sl slated. TIk* 
locusts were all on the white-oak land and on the Roanoke River and 
not on the pine lands." Assuminii: the dates is:^)9 and 1.S.56 to be the 
correct ones, this would throw this swarm of Cicadas into Brood XV. 
