62 
THE PERIODICAL CICADA. 
and if there are any representatives left they should reappear in 1907. 
The distribution, l)y States and counties, is as follows: 
New Jersey. — Cape May, Essex. 
New York. — Dutchess, Richmond, Saratoga. 
North Carolina. — Halifax. 
Brood X\J—Septendecim—190S. (Fig. 19.) 
This old Brood IX of Riley (VII of Walsh-Riley) is a very small 
and doubtful one, and represents a few isolated colonies in the 
extreme western portion of the range of the species, possibly two 
years belated swarms of Brood XIV. It was reported as occur- 
FlG. 19.— Map showing distribution of Brood X\l, 11(08. 
ring in 1857 in southeastern Nebraska, and a very definite record 
for Franklin County, Ark., wliich apparently pertains to tliis brood, 
was obtained in 1885. Mr. J. M. Pettigrew, writing under date of 
July 1, states that the cicadas were numerous in that county hi May, 
1857, and in 1874, doing some injury to small branches of fruit trees, 
especially apple. This record falls in the western central part of the 
State, and is surrounded by 13-year records, but is at an elevation 
of a thousand feet or more and, in view of the defmiteness of the 
report, does not seem to be open to doul)t. There is a doubtful 
record reporting the Cicada in Lee County, Iowa, in 1874, wliich 
seems to belonir to tliis brood. 
