592 
ADDENDA FT COJtRTGFNDA. 
Page line 
GG 8 from the bottom, for “ Praya ” read : Praia. 
7 from the bottom, far “ Caniso ” read : Canico. 
G8 35, add to syn. : S. carpinifolia Bucli 196. no. 311. 
GO 10, after “longer” add: Cal. Avith 2 or mostly 3 linear or 
linear-lanceolate br. at the base as in Malva parvi- 
flora L. 
— 22, for “ Cha Ingleza ” read r Cha bravo. 
— 29, Obs. The greatest difficulty and confusion besets the syno- 
nymy of this pi. Webb has certainly confounded two 
distinct sp. under his Can. S. rhombifolia i. 36, — one 
being identical with the Mad. pi. a, and the other, S. 
oculata Lowe (not found in Mad.) distinguished by its 
broader greener 1. not canescent beneath, its larger 
deeper-coloured bright orange fl. with a dark purple eye 
and more numerous (“ 12-1 5 ”) ahvays 2-beaked carpels. 
His description as to size of 1. and cor. can belong only 
to 8. oculata ; but iu what it says of the underside of 
the 1. and denotes of the carpel-beak or mucro , speaking 
of it in the singular number, it is only applicable to S. 
rliombifolia L. a. maderensis of the present work. I 
have therefore to offer the following corrected and en- 
larged synonymy for the Mad. pi. : — 
8. rliombifolia , Linn. ! Sp. PI. (ed. 2) 961, cum var. ; Ejusd. ! 
Herb, quoad cx. ad dextram scliedse (altero ad sinistram pedunculis 
petiolos vix superantibus prorsus distincto). S. fol. lanceolato- 
rhomboidibus serratis, Ejusd. ! Ilort. Ups. 199. no. 5. — Yarr. : — 
a. maderensis Loavc ; carpels 1-rostrate, beak or awn from | to 
about the length of carpel. — 8. maderensis Prim. 35, 36. S. rJiombi- 
folia Linn. ! 1. c. ; Lam. Diet. i. 4 ; Bucli 196. no. 340 ; WB. i. 36 
(partly). Malvinda unicornis &c. Dill. Hort. Elth. 216, t. 172. 
f. 212. Althaea Carpini folio Bocc. Ic. 11, t. 6. ff. iib, iic. Alcea 
Pharnambucana Moris. Hist. ii. 528. § 5, t. 19. ff. 7, 8. — Mad. reg. 
1,2; ccc. Also found here and there by roadsides &c. in the Can. 
(Tdherifc, Palma, and with a very short beak in Gomera), but con- 
founded by Webb with another Can. sp., 8. oculata Lowe. 
Linnaeus by his /3 in ed. 2 seems to have only intended to dis- 
tinguish the more depauperated roadside wild state of the pi., as 
figured by Bocconc and Morison, from the luxuriant cultivated 
form of the Hort. Eltham. and of his own Herb. 
/3. canariensis Lowe; carpels 2-rostrato or bicuspidate, beaks 
shorter than in a. — 8. rliombifolia Cav. Diss. i. 23, t. 3. f. 12 ; 
Willd. “ iii. 740;” Loir. Suppl. i. 20; Pcrs. ii. 243; Spr. iii. 111. 
no. 22; DC. i. 462. no. 35; Scub. 46. S. canariensis Willd. “iii. 
735 Poir. 1. c. 19 ; Pcrs. ii. 242 ; Spr. 1. c. no. 24 ; DC. 1. c. 
no. 34 (excl. syn. 8. alba Cav. t. iii. f. 8, quae aristis gloehidiatis 
earpellorum distinctissima). — Mad. reg. 1, r. Calheta, P ,a do Sol, 
P t0 da Cruz at the Scrrado. Not found iu the Can. by the writer! 
