$4 Dr. Herschel’s Discovery of four additional 
Most likely this satellite also was seen among the supposed 
satellites south of the planet, March 27, 1 794 ; where we find 
mention made of “ some others south, at a good distance/' 
In that case, this will make a second observation. 
We have a third observation of the same new satellite March 
5, 1 796 ; when a very small star was seen, in a place where the 
evening before there had been none ; as appears by the confi- 
guration of the 5th of March. See figure 6. At the time of the 
observation, the planet was come to the longitude of the place 
where the star was perceived to be; which agrees with the idea 
of its having been brought to that situation by the planet. It 
may be objected, that the star could not be verified with a power 
of boo; but here we have more than a bare suspicion of the 
satellite, for the observation says, “ I had a pretty certain 
“ glimpse of it ;” and this appears also from the assigned 
place of the star at the intersection of two given lines. For, 
such a delineation could not have been made, without having 
perceived it with a considerable degree of steady vision. Its 
distance, to judge by the description, will agree sufficiently 
with the two foregoing observations of this new exterior sa- 
tellite. 
The most distant Satellite. 
On Feb. 28, 1794, a star was perceived where on the 26th 
there was none. This star was larger than a very small star 
which was observed the 26th, not far from the place of the 
new supposed satellite ; and a configuration having been made 
expressly, by way of ascertaining what stars might afterwards 
come into a situation where they could be mistaken for satel- 
lites, our new star or satellite would not have been omitted. 
