66 Dr. Herschel's Discovery of four additional 
which is mentioned as not having been seen the 25th, when 
the delineation of the stars was made, will agree very well with 
the two former observations ; and, being near the greatest elon- 
gation, the distance of this satellite is well pointed out, and 
agrees remarkably well with the calculation of the first obser- 
vation of it. 
It remains now only to be mentioned, that in such delicate 
observations as these of the additional satellites, there may 
possibly arise some doubts with those who are very scrupulous; 
but, as I have been much in the habit of seeing very small and 
dim objects, I have not been detained from publishing these 
observations sooner, on account of the least uncertainty about 
the existence of these satellites, but merely because I was in 
hopes of being able soon to give a better account of them, with 
regard to their periodical revolutions. It did not appear satis- 
factory to me to announce a satellite, unless I could, at the same 
time, have pointed out more precisely the place where it might 
be found by other astronomers. But, as more time is now already 
elapsed than I had allowed myself for a completion of the theory 
of these satellites, I thought it better not to defer the communi- 
cation any longer. 
The arrangement of the four new and the two old satellites 
together will be thus : 
First satellite, the interior one of Jan. 18, 1790. 
Second satellite, the nearest old one of Jan. 11, 1787. 
Third satellite, the intermediate one of March 26, 1 794. 
Fourth satellite, the farthest old one of Jan. 11, 1787. 
Fifth satellite, the exterior one of Feb. 9, 1790. 
Sixth satellite, the most distant one of Feb. 28, 1794. 
