6 
THE VOYAGE OF H.M.S. CHALLENGER. 
point on the opposite side. I have not thought it necessary to give the inferior 
measurement below the base of the skull between the two supra-auricular points. 
I have determined the relative projection of the zygomatic arches as compared with 
the transverse diameter of the cranium, by placing the skull, without the lower jaw, on a 
low table, resting it on the teeth and the most depending parts behind. Then, standing 
erect, I have looked down on the vertex with the right eye directed to the bregma and 
with the left closed. The terms phsenozygous and cryptozygous employed by Mr. Busk 
have been used to express whether, from this point of view, the zygomata were visible or 
invisible. 
The basi-nasal and basi-alveolar diameters have been taken from the basion, in the 
one case to the nasion, in the other to the alveolar point, and the gnathic index has been 
basi-alveolar length x 100 . .. , ' , 
Ihe classification employed by flower 
calculated from the 
basi-nasal length 
into Orthognathous below 98 ; Mesognathous from 98 to 103 ; Prognathous above 103 has 
been adopted. The basion has therefore been taken as an important central point for 
determining the length in a straight line from it to the alveolar point, the nasion, and 
the bregma. 
The length of the foramen magnum from basion to opisthion is given. This measure- 
ment, along with the basi-nasal length, and the longitudinal arc, also recorded in the 
tables, will enable the entire circumference of the cranial box mesially and antero- 
posteriorly to be computed. 
The interzygomatic breadth is the distance between the most projecting parts of the 
zygomatic arches. The intermalar breadth has been taken on a line with the hinder border 
of the orbital process. The ophryo-alveolar length is measured from the ophryon to the 
alveolar point, and the naso-alveolar length from the nasion to the same point. The 
facial index expresses, according to the method pf Broca, the relations of the inter- 
zygomatic breadth to the ophryo-alveolar length, and is arrived at by the following 
formula : 
Ophryo-alveolar length x 100 
I do not attach much importance to a facial 
Bizygomatic diameter 
index based upon the ophryo-alveolar length; partly on account of the imperfect defini- 
tion of the ophryon, and partly because the lower jaw is left out of consideration in the 
determination of the length of the face. The nasal and orbital measurements, with their 
respective indices, have been taken according to the methods of M. Broca, and the classi- 
fication employed by Broca and by Flower has been adopted: e.g., Nasal index, Leptorhine, 
below 48 ; Mesorhine, from 48 to 53 ; Platyrhine, above 53 : Orbital index, Microseme, 
below 84 ; Mesoseme, from 84 to 89 ; Megaseme, above 89. 
Professor Broca also estimated 1 the dimensions of the hard palate without including 
the dentary arcade. Professor Flower modified and improved these measurements by 
1 Instructions Craniologiques, p. 77. 
