1913-14.] The Place in Nature of the Tasmanian Aboriginal. 151 
Table VIII. — Comparison oe the Frontal Angle. 
Minimum. 
Average. 
Maximum. 
1. Pithecanthropus erectus .... 
52*5 
2. An adult male chimpanzee 
56 
3. Three Spy-Neandertal .... 
57-5 
64-8 
70 
4. Gibraltar ...... 
73 
5. Briix . 
74-7 
6. Briinn ....... 
75 
7. Galley Hill 
82 
8. Cro-Magnon ...... 
83 
9. Four Kalmucks ..... 
80 
85-2 
91 
10. One hundred Australians, unsexed . 
71 
85-2 
100 
11. Forty-four Tasmanians, unsexed 
72 
86 
96 
12. Egisheim 
89 
13. Stangenas 
92-5 
14. Forty Europeans, unsexed 
73 
92-5 
103 
15. Twenty-four Dschagga negroes 
88 
100-3 
110 
Veddahs absent. 
Table IX. — Comparison of the Bregma Foot-Point Positional Index. 
Minimum. 
Average. 
Maximum. 
1. An adult male gibbon .... 
63-4 
2. Pithecanthropus erectus .... 
39-7 
44-1 
50-2 
3. Stangenas ...... 
38-9 
4. Briix ....... 
37-3 
5. Three Spy-Neandertal .... 
34-8 
36-6 
40-1 
6. Gibraltar ...... 
35-2 
7. Galley Hill 
34-3 
8. One hundred Australians, unsexed 
29-2 
34-1 
38-8 
9. Briinn 
. . 
34 
10. Forty-four Tasmanians, unsexed 
26 
33-5 
40-6 
11. Egisheim ...... 
33-3 
12. Four Kalmucks 
30-1 
32-8 
37-4 
13. Cro-Magnon 
32-6 
14. Twenty-four Dschagga negroes 
26-6 
32-1 
37-2 
15. Forty-five Europeans, unsexed 
22-2 
30-4 
35-7 
Veddahs absent. 
