1913-14.] The Place in Nature of the Tasmanian Aboriginal. 161 
Table D. — Comparison of the Distance of the Bregma Foot-Point from 
the Glabella on the Glabella- Lambda Line. 
1 
Minimum. 
Average. 
Maximum. 
1. Pithecanthropus erectus (Klaatsch) 
79-5 
2. Gibraltar ...... 
82-2? 
3. Forty-eight Tasmanians, unsexed 
65 
82-3 
96 
4. One hundred Australians, unsexed . 
73 
85-3 
101 
5. Galley Hill (Klaatsch) .... 
91-5 
6. Cro-Magnon old man (Klaatsch) 
91-5 
7. Briinn (Klatsch) 
92-7 
8. Three Spy-Neandertal (Klaatsch) 
98 
9. Briix (Schwalbe estimated) 
100-5 
Anthropoids, Kalmucks, Veddahs, Europeans, Dschagga negroes, Egisheim, 
and Stangenas absent. 
Table E. — Comparison of the Bregma Foot-Point Glabella-Lambda Index. 
Minimum. 
Average. 
Maximum. 
1. Pithecanthropus erectus .... 
46-4 
2. Gibraltar ..... 
46-4? 
3. Forty-eight Tasmanians, unsexed 
40-1 
46-7 
51-8 
4. Briinn ....... 
47 
5. Galley Hill 
47-1 
6. One hundred Australians, unsexed . 
40-9 
47-2 
53-1 
7. Cro-Magnon old man . 
47-4 
8. Three Spy-Neandertal .... 
52-8 
9. Briix 
54-3 
Anthropoids, Kalmucks, Veddahs, Europeans, Dschagga negroes, Egisheim, 
and Stangenas absent. 
In the foregoing tables there are several points to which we should like 
to direct particular attention. 
Firstly, as regards the tables, Nos. I. to XXVII. are those already 
employed in our previous Tasmanian work (3). Tables A to E inclusive 
comprise the additional observations which we then stated we intended to 
employ in our Australian researches, and which are, therefore, now included. 
It is a matter of congratulation that we are enabled to incorporate the five 
additional observations not previously made upon the Tasmanian. Mr L. 
W. G. Buchner, a recently appointed Victorian Government Research 
Scholar in the Physical Anthropological Laboratory of the University of 
Melbourne, has been engaged in an examination of the Tasmanian facial 
VOL. xxxiv. 11 
