Hudot^ G. WanneA, U.V 
Page 3 
OcXobtA 27, 1976 
1 . 
4. 
nadioaoZl\)e uku>tu u ^ ^ ^e.^eAence to 
to be a&iuAed, beyond att AeoAonabto^^^’ ujould tike 
^ not contiu ^ umtewateA 
tion to be hoAmlut to (DSSC ^^Hi<u.ent coneentfia- 
handtek 6plUage ol Aadioar^'^^^l^' * addAei6 how NIH 
contAactotu do wtth the ^ ticejued 
to then,? ^uuUoactAve mateAXaJU which oAe dUtAlbuted 
«* fnuente-d above., 
ioUomOtg mUteuT 6o» <«loim<LUon aeUtioe to the 
tlrf! by 
ot<aZgoU ol HIH motemtea dS^g 
oi the S" !StmuId o^^r^„r^-'^‘^‘^S Reguto- 
a rnpi/ 0^ theAe Aamotina P^ov<ded with 
radioactive iubitanccA ^ ^^tog^cal, chemical, and 
tioM. Could we alAo be p^vidtT^l^ri^^ ptumbing Aegulo- 
uyuipnmiXu oj uoua waUeu^eA? ^ d^AciUA^con on the 
and ;t/ie Fiyial-ElS ^ the 
not ju6t the quantitu WIH'^ woAteioateA - 
ifnpact on the waAtewauteA tAi^^^t °i & woAteioateA iA an 
in thcAe impact 6tatementA. ^y^tem and should be addAeA6ed 
Comr^4^„»4 cpmmentA in the 
"• njT 
eoeoidoAotixm 
toAy iewehi aasteo pawn to doipooat to the oaoo- 
JMuooceo- oo mentioned 
3. 
Appendix K— 114 
