VI. —BIBLIOGRAPHY OF WORKS DEALING ESPECIALLY WITH 
PERMO-CARBONIFEROUS AND PERMIAN FORAMINIFERA. 
1. Brady, H. B. — A Monograph of Carboniferous and Permian Fora- 
minifera (the genus Fusulina excepted) . Palaeontographical Society, 
YoL XXX, 1876, pp. 1-166, 12 Pis. London. 
2 Chapman, P. — The Poraminifera. 1902, pp. 39, 258-260. London. 
3. GtEINItz, H. B. — Dyas, oder die Zechstein formation und das Both- 
liegende, Heft 1. — Die animalischen Ueberreste des Dyas. 4to. 
1861, pp. 39, 120-123, Pis. X and XX. Leipzig. 
4. Idem. — Carbonformation und Dyas in Nebraska — Nova Acta Acad. 
Caes. Leop. Carol., Vol. XXXIII, Lief. 4, 1866, pp. 1-91, 5 Pis. 
Dresden. 
5. Gumbel, C. W., von. — Kurze Anleitung zu geologischen Beobaclit- 
ungen in den Alpen. — Zeitschr. Deutsch. u. Oesterr. Alpcnvereins, 
Beilage Band, 1878, pp. 25-192, numerous figures. Miinclien. 
(Erroneously referred to as Trias.) 
6. Howchin, W. — On the Occurrence of Poraminifera in the Permo- 
Carboniferous Bocks of Tasmania. Beport Austr. Assoc. Adv. 
Science, Adelaide Meeting (1893), 1894, pp. 344-348, Pis. X, XI. 
Adelaide. 
7. Idem. — A Census of the Possil Poraminifera of Australia. Beport 
Austr. Assoc. Adv. Science, Adelaide Meeting (1893), 1894, 
pp. 365-6. 
8. Idem. — Carboniferous Foraminifera of Western Australia, with 
descriptions of new species. Trans. R. Soc. S. Australia, 1895, 
pp. 194-198, PI. X. Adelaide. (Doubtfully referable in age to 
Permo-Carboniferous; see Prof. David’s remarks, antea, p. xii.) 
9. Jones, T. R. — In W. King’s Mon. Permian Fossils of England. 
Palaeontographical Society, Yol. Ill, 1850, Pis. London. 
