27 
(43.) 1880. Feistmantel (Dr. 0.) Notes on the Fossil Flora of Eastern Australia and 
Tasmania. Journ. and Proc. Boy. Soc. X. S. Wales, 1830, Vol. XIV, p. 103. 
This is an abstract of my above work. There I have already correlated 
the Talchir beds, Bacchus Marsh beds, and Hawkesbury beds, which corre- 
lation, however, now, with regard to the latter, is no more tenable, because 
the Newcastle beds have now to take the place of the Hawkesbury beds, 
while they, themselves, occupy a higher position analogous to that of the 
Damudas in India. Here, also, is to be mentioned that the Lepidodendron 
beds of Port Stephens and Stroud are wrongly placed above the Lower Marine 
Series. 
(44.) 1879-1880. Wilkinson (C, S.) Report of Progress of the Geological Survey during 
the year 1879. Ann. Report Depart. Mines, N. S. Wales for 1879. [1880.], pp. 213-217. 
Mr. Wilkinson refers to the palaeontological specimens in the Inter- 
national Exhibition of Sydney (p. 21G). 
In the same work there are also given figures of Macrotceniopteris 
wianamcittcB, Eeistm. (PLY.), and of Palceonisous antipodeus , Egert. (PI. VI.), 
from the Gib Tunnel, Wianamatta Shales. 
(45.) 1878. Guide du Geologie a l’Exposition Univcrselle de 1878 et dans les Collections 
publiques et privees de Paris. 
There are in the chapter “ Stratigrapliical Geology,” notes by M. 
Zeiller upon the age of the specimens of fossil plants from the New 
South Wales coal-beds sent by Mr. Wilkinson.* In these notes M. Zeiller 
quite distinctly pleads for the separation of the Newcastle beds from the 
underlying marine beds, and thinks rather that they are more closely con- 
nected with the Hawkesbury and Wianamatta beds. lie, however, is 
inclined to consider them as of Oolitic age, which they of course are not. 
(46.) 1879. Feistmantel (Dr. 0.) The Flora of the Talchir-Karharbari Beds. “Fossil 
Flora of the Gondwana System,” Vol. Ill, part I, and Suppl. 1888. PaUontolog'wa indica, 
Ser. XII, Part 1, 1879, and Suppl., 1881. 
In this Memoir I have, on pp. 31, 32, quite distinctly established 
the correlation of the Talchir-Karharbari beds with the Bacchus Marsh beds 
in Victoria on palaeontological evidence only. The Bacchus Marsh beds 
I then considered as probably representative of the Newcastle beds, and the 
same was therefore the case with the Talchir-Karharbari beds. In the 
supplement to the above work (1881) I have, however, already, under the 
* Compare “ The International Congress of Geologists, Paris, 1878,” by Prof. Liversidge. Journ. and 
Proc. Roy. Soc. X. S. Wales, 1879, Vol. XIII, pp. 39-40. 
