69 
Morris and Dana recorded Eurydesma from “ Illawarra,” but though 
this district has been largely collected from, no further specimens have been 
found; considering the great abundance of Emvjdesma found in typical localities 
this is strange, and may probal)ly be due to an error in labelling. Freeh 
recorded^ Leiomyalina antarctica from “ Kilama,” New South Wales — this 
probably is meant for “ Kiama,” a well-known locality in the Illawarra 
District — Upper Marine. It is suggested that the argument used in connec- 
tion with Morris’ record might be applied to this case also. 
With regard to the other New South "Wales localities referred to there 
is no evidence, stratigrapliical or palaeontological, in favour of their being 
newer than the Lower Marine Series — so that with one exception we are 
inclined to xe^Sir(\. Eurydesma in New South VFales as being characteristic of 
rocks of the Lower Marine Stage. 
In Queensland Em'ydesma has been collected at Yatton, which must 
be regarded as of Lower Marine age. Specimens imperfectly preserved, and 
in all probability referable to Eurydesma, have recently been eollected by one 
of us at Gympie — in beds which can be correlated with the Permo- 
Carboniferous of Northern New England. 
Freeh — Abhandl., op. ck., p. 201. 
