310 
BULLETIN OF THE NATURAL HISTORY SOCIETY. 
feet above the sea, a remarkable agreement with the 
measurement checked from the stations ; hence we may 
accept 1612 feet above the sea. This beautiful lake is 
therefore higher than Milnagek (Note 56). heretofore 
supposed to be the most elevated lake of any size in the 
province. But Indian Lake is also exceeded by the fol- 
lowing. 
Moose (or Rocky Brook ) Lake. By direct measurement, 323 
feet above the Crooked Deadwater, and about 60 feet 
above Indian Lake whence 1673 f ee t above the sea. This 
height was so surprising, not only as worked out roughly 
on the ground, but as determined more exactly since, that 
I have inclined to keep all my figures conservative, and I 
am sure it is at least this height, and perhaps somewhat 
higher. This makes it the highest lake of any size yet 
measured, considerably exceeding Milnagek (Note 56), 
hitherto the highest known, as well as Indian Lake, also 
higher than the latter. 
Parker Lake. By direct measurement 95 feet over Indian Lake, 
and hence 1707 feet above the sea, and the highest pond 
or lake yet measured in New Brunswick. It is hence 
higher than the preceding, but is merely a shallow pond, 
like so many others on the top of the central peneplain. 
Height of land between Parker and Indian Lakes (on the 
hunter’s trail). By direct measurement 165 feet over 
Indian Lake; hence 1777 f ee t above the sea. 
Height of land between Moose Lake and Indian Lake Stream , 
(on the trail). By direct measurement 389 feet over 
Crooked Deadwater, and hence 1739 feet above the sea. 
Ridge South West of Crooked Deadwater, (on the trail). By 
direct measurement, 189 feet over the latter; hence 1339 
feet above the sea. 
Height of land on the Holmes-Rcnous Portage, 150 feet over 
Holmes Lake; hence 1286 feet above the sea. 
Renous Lake. Mean of six measurements, checked from Fred- 
ericton 1183 feet, and from Chatham 1170 feet; hence 1176 
feet above the sea. My attempts to make direct measure- 
ments between this and Holmes Lake (the latter of which 
I made 1136 feet in 1901, Note 55), were foiled by the 
very changeable weather, but they seemed to show no 
great difference between the two, with Renous somewhat 
the higher. Hence we may accept the figure above given. 
.Pond at the old driving darn, \ x / 2 miles above the Little South 
Branch. Mean of two measurements, checked from 
