( 9°o ) 
M nnvzs admerat\ mque erat navali fugna ftmiliSi quippe 
ubi nihil vcluntarium, nihil artis aut confilii e(f(t. IJns 
natura freti aflujquc totius ccrtaminis potens, fuis^ alienis 
navibus, nequicquam remigio in contrarium tendentes inve-> 
hebat ; ut fagientem videres retro vortice intortam vi^ri* 
clbus illatam, [equentem, fi in contrarium traBum inci- 
dijfet maris, fugienth modo Jefe avertentem. Jam in ipsa 
fugna h£c, cum infefto ro/lro peteret ho(lium navtm, ohli* 
qua ip[a Hium alterius roflri accipiebat: ilia, cum tranfver^ 
fa objiceretur hofli, repente into.rta in proram circumage- 
batur. 
The other Pailage is Lib. XLIII. C. 3. Et alia novi 
generis hominum legatio ex Hifpania vsnit : Ex militibus 
Romanis ^ ex Hifpanis mulieribus, cum quibus connu- 
hium non effet, natos fe memorantes, [upra quatuor millia 
hominum, orabant ut fibi oppidum in quo habitarent dare- 
titr. Senatus decrevit, uti mmina fua apud L» Canuleium 
frofiterentur, eorumque fiqaos manumifffet^ eos Carteiam 
ad Oceanum deduct placere ^i Carteienfium domi ma- 
nere vellent, pot eft at em fore uti numero coionorum cffent, 
agro ajjignato. Latinam earn coloniam fuijfe, Libert ino- 
rumque appellari. 
The bed Spanifh Authors, and Ortelius and Cellarius 
trufting to them, take this Carteia of Liv^ to be diffe- 
rent from that which was the next to Calpe^ and place 
it generally about ConiL Rodrigo Caro in his Qonvento 
Juridico de Sevilla C. 2^. applies the Carteia in the XLIII 
Book of Liv) to Rocadillo , and in Cap. to Car^ 
taia near Lefe. It is furprizing he takes no notice of 
the Paflage in the XXVIII Book, For the particular 
mention of ad Oceamm, and Urbs ea in ora Oceantfita eft, 
implies they both relate to the fame place ; perhaps it 
was becaufe he could not reconcile it with his CartaU 
near Lepe. Cellarius makes Bsjippo this Carteia of Livy, 
c. Ba/ippOf qu£ videtur Carteia Livii eft'e, extra 
(return. 
