[ it* ] 
4944 to 7 20; which reduced, becomes 732+ of 
the Englijh Foot, as before, and as it came out 
from my own Tryal. 
The Roman Foot is given by Ticart from this 
very Stone 65-3 fo of fuch Parts as the Faris Foot 
contains 710 j that is, by Redu&ion, 967 + of 
the Englijh ; and the fame by Fabrettf who alfo 
meafiired it upon this Stone, is align’d to the Palm 
of the Archite&s, as 2040 to 1545*; which reduc’d 
upon the former Meafure of the Palm, is 9 66 j of 
the Englijh Foot. Thefe Meafures come out as 
near as the Nature of the Standard can poffibly al- 
low ; and as it was fomewhat frefher in Monfieur 
Ficarfs Time than it is now, I would make no 
Difference in the Proportion he has affign’d ; but 
fuppofe the Roman Foot on this Marble was intend- 
ed to be fuch a one as fliould contain 967 Parts of 
the Englijh very nearly. 
Mr. Greaves had long before aflign’d the Mea- 
fure of the Roman Foot from Cojfutius' s Monument, 
to be 967 of the Englijh , and had preferred that 
Meafure to the others he had taken from the Tomb 
of Statiliusy and the Congius of Vefpajian . And I 
think one can make no doubt, from what has been 
{aid, but Cojfutius ’s Foot was the Foot intended to 
be infcribed upon this Marble,- though that Mo- 
nument is itfelf now loft: at leaft when I was at 
Rome I could get no Intelligence of it, though I 
made a diligent Enquiry amongft all the People 
likely to be acquainted with it. 
Fabrettiy in his Work concerning Aqueducts, 
where he gives the above-mentioned Proportion of 
the 
