SPECIMENS OE FOSSIL CEPHALOPODA. 
7 
Aegoceras tortile (A. d’Orbigny) : T. Wright, v. Aegoceras 
laqueolus (U. Schloenbach) : T. Wright. 
Aegoceras valdani (A. d’Orbigny) : T. Wright, Lias Amm. (Mon. 
Pal. Soc.), pt. iii, 1880, pi. xxxviii, f, 3 ; pt. v, 1882, p. 358. Lower 
Lias {ihex-zono): Loc. (?). [C. 1871.] 
Aegoceras valdani (A. d’Orbigny) : T. Wright, Lias Amm. (Mon- 
Pal. Soc.), pt. V, 1882, p. 359, pi. Ixix, ff. 2, 3, 4. Lower Lias 
(ibex-zone) : Wiirtemberg. [C. 1872.] 
Agoniatites bohemicus (J. Barrande) : A. H. Poord & G. C. Crick, 
Cat. Loss. Ceph., British Museum, pt. iii, 1897, p. 34, ff. 5 e, f. 
Lower Devonian (Etage P): Hlubocep, Bohemia. [70976 a.] 
Agoniatites vanuxemi (J. Hall) : A. H. Poord & G. C. Crick, Cat. 
Poss. Ceph., British Museum, pt. iii, 1897, p. 58, f. 22. Middle 
Devonian (Marcellus Shale, Hamilton Group) : New York State. 
[34909.] 
Agoniatites verna.rhenanus (P. Maurer): A. H. Poord & G. C. 
Crick, Cat. Poss. Ceph., British Museum, pt. iii, 1897, p. 286, f. 141 
(suture-line). Lower Devonian (Orthoceras-Schiefer) : Olkenbach, 
N.E. of Wittlich, Ehenish Prussia. [C. 5936.] 
Aipoceras, v. Gyroceras (Aipoceras). 
Amaltheus greenonghi (J. Sowerby) : T. Wright, Lias Amm. (Mon. 
Pal. Soc.), pt. iv, 1881, pi. xliv ; pt. v, 1882, p. 384. Lower Lias 
(? zone) : Somerset. [82363.] “ The figured specimen has no 
locality attached to it, but the rock appears to resemble the Lias of 
Lyme.” — Wright. 
Amaltheus guibalianus (A. d’Orbigny): T. Wright, Lias Amm. 
(Mon. Pal. Soc.), pt. iv. 1881, pi. xlv, ff. 1, 2 ; pt. v, 1882, p. 386. 
Lower Lias (oxynotus-zone) : Loc. (?). [C. 2224.] 
Amaltheus guibalianus (A. d’Orbigny) : T. Wright, Lias Amm. 
(Mon. Pal. Soc.), pt. iv, 1881, pi. xlv, f. 4 ; pt. v, 1882, p. 386. 
Lower Lias (oxynotus-zono) : Leckhampton, Gloucestershire. 
[C. 1882.] 
Amaltheus guibalianus (A. d’Orbigny): T. Wright, Lias Amm. 
(Mon. Pal. Soc.), pt. iv, 1881, pi. xlv, ff. 6, 7 ; pt. v, 1882, p. 385. 
Lower Lias (oxynotus-zono) : Loc. (?). [C. 1895.] Prom the 
“ Wright coll.,” but some doubt about its being the figured specimen. 
It is slightly larger than Wright’s figure and does not show the inner 
whorls. 
