[ 9 ] 
one Mufcle, only having one of its flefhy Parts' for- 
wards, and the other backwards, I fee no Rcafon why 
they might not have their Appellations continued from 
their Situations, with this Difference only, that, in- 
flead of accounting them feparate Muicles, they 
fhould be only properly fpeaking, the frontal and 
occipital Portions of the fame Mufcle. And indeed 
that accurate Anatomift Dr. fames "Douglas has 
juftly call'd them the Occipito frontalis, as one di - 
gaftric Mufcle, having a Belly of flefhy Fibres before 
and behind 5 and feparately defcribed the tru t frontal 
Mufcle having its Origination from the Procefs of 
the Os Frontis mention'd before, and terminating in 
the anterior flefhy Part of the former. 
XIV. 
And although this frontal Mufcle (or Corrugator 
of Coiter , who firft difcover'd it) is the fame that 
Cowper calls the internal flefhy Production only of the 
frontal , yet Cowper declares he fees no Reafon to 
make them diftinft Mufcles 5 which I own furprifes 
me, fince their Fibres have a different Direction and 
Office, from the anterior flefhy Part of the Occipito- 
frontalis . 
XV. 
As to the Adions of the true Frontal , t>r Corru- 
gator Coiteri , I muft diffent from all Authors in one 
Particular > it is faid, that this Mufcle ferves to puli 
down the Skin of the Forehead, after it has been 
wrinkled. Now, let any one, by moving the Oc- 
cipitofrontalis , pull up the Eyebrows, and wrinkle 
C the 
