1G1 
the shape of its leaf, our species approaches the preceding one, from which it 
principally differs hy its more tender texture and its thinner primary nerve. 
Locality and Horizon . — Dalton, near Gunning ; in hard, siliceous grit, 
reposing on Silurian rocks. 
Eljeodexdron subdegener, sp. non. 
Plate XIV, Figs. G, Ga. 
Sp. Char. — E. foliis coriaceis, anguste lanceolatis basi angustatis 
dcntato-crenulatis ; nervatione brochidodroma ; nervo primario firmo ; nervis 
secundariis tenuibis, subarcuatis ramosis ; tertiariis dictyodromis, reticulo 
valde evoluto. 
Ohs. — Closely allied to Elccodendron degener (Ficus, Unger, Eossile 
Elora von Sotzka) and only differing from it by the narrower lamina and 
a more developed network, represented in Eig. 6a, enlarged. The tertiary 
nerves are flexuous and anastomosing. Delating to size and shape of leaf our 
fossil, Eig. 6, corresponds to the specimen of Elceodendron degener, from 
Sotzka (loc. cit. PI. XXXIY, Eig. 1). 
Locality and Horizon. — Eox and Partridge’s claim, between Dose 
Valley and the Ded Ilill, 2 miles from Emmaville (Vegetable Creek Town- 
ship); ironstone shale from Newer Leads (stanniferous), under basalt. 
ILICINEyE. 
Ilex Macleayana, sp. nov. 
Plate XIV, Figs. 11, 11 a. 
Sp. Char. — I. foliis coriaceis, oblongo-ovatis, in petiolum angustatis, 
sparsim dentatis ; nervatione brochidodroma ; nervo primario distincto ; 
nervis secundariis subangulis acutis orientibus abbreviate, ramosis, inter se 
conjunctis, ramis cum nervis tertiariis rcte macrosynammatum prominens 
formantibus. 
Ohs. — Corresponds in all its characters to Llex herheridifolia, Heer, 
the network, being prominent and very similar to that of the latter, is 
represented in Eig. 11a, enlarged. The only marks of difference between the 
two species are, that the shape of flic lamina of the above species is more 
oblong and the teeth of their borders less prominent than on the other. 
Locality and Horizon. — With the preceding species. 
