( ^‘4 ) 
I have no Inclination to enter into this Contro- 
verfy ; it is in better and abler Hands : but, as the 
Point in Dilpute is of the utmoll Importance to Man- 
kind, I heartily wilh, that, without Paffion, Preju- 
dice, or private Views, it may be fairly and maturely 
examin’d. In order to which, if the following Ex- 
trad:s and Computations, concerning the comparative 
Danger of the Inoculated and Natural Small Pox, may 
be of any Ule to your felf, or to other impartial and 
difinterelled Judges, I fliall think my Labour well be- 
llowed. 
The Number of Perlbns, who have had the Small 
Pox by Inoculation here in England^ is, by the bell 
Information I have been able to colled:, as follows. 
Inoculated by 
'Dr. Nett let on - - - - - - - - 6 i 
Claudius Amyand^ Efq; Serjeant Surgeon - 17 
Mr. Maitland^ Surgeon 5*7 
Dr. T^O'ver - 
Ml. Weymijh^ Surgeon 3 
The Reverend Mr. yohnjbn . - , . 3 
Dr. Brady at Bot^tfinouth - - - - 4 
Mr. Smithy Surgeon, and Mr. E>ymer^' 2 ^ 
Apothecary, 2.rChichejier - - - 5 
Islr. IVallet\ K^othtc^iry 2.1 GoJ^ort - - 3' 
A Woman at Leicefter 8 
Dr. Williams at Haverford Weft - - - (5 
Two other Perfons near the lame Place - - x 
Dr. French^ at Briftol - i 
In all — i8x 
Out of this Number the Oppolers of Inoculation 
affirm, that two Perfons died of the Inoculated Small 
Pox ; the Favourers of this Pradice maintain, that their 
Death was occafioned by other Caufes. If, to avoid 
dilpute, 
