1 
» 
( m ) 
dor to whom he was indebted for his Kingdom, and 
focallhimfelfTIBERl VS CLAVDIVS GO- 
GIDVBN VS. 
I fuppofe him to have been a Regulus of the Dobu- 
ni ^ becaufe we are told by Dion Caffim , that Aulm 
Plautius having put to flight Cataratacus and Togo- 
dumnus^ Sons of Cunobelin^ part of the Eoduni (the 
fame People as the Dohunt) who were fubjed to the Ca- 
tuellani^ fubmitted to the Romans ^ and the Name Cogi- 
dubnus^ or Cogiduvnus, COC 0 ©Ubtt, or 2)Uhlt hg- 
nifying exprefly in the Britifh Language P R I N- 
CEPS DOBVNORVM, feems to put the Mat- 
ter out of all doubt. 
How far his Territories extended, it is irnpoffible to 
define. Bifiiop Stillingfleet ® fuppofes them to have 
lain in Surrey and SujJex *, Suffex certainly was Part 
ofthem, fince the Temple mentioned in this Infcrip- 
tion was ereded in it by his Authority , and it is 
not unlikely, that befides the Rogni, who were the 
People of thofe two Counties, he might have that Part 
of the which had fubmitted to the Romans, and 
feems to have been his own Principality, together with 
the Ancalites, Bibroci, and Segontiaci, whofe Countries 
lay between the Dobuni and the Regni, bellowed Upon 
him ^ the Words Civitntes qu^dam in Tacitm, not im- 
porting no more than {ome few Towns, but fever al Peo- 
ple, the Word Civitas always fignifying a People m that 
Hiftorian. 
Before I proceed any farther, it will not be amifs to 
obferve, that Togodumnus and Cogiduhnus, tho’ tlieir 
Names are fo much alike, were two dildincl Perfons : 
The firfl was Son of Cunobelin, King of the Trinoban- 
tesy 
c In lib. LX, V. Eaxtei-i Gloflar. in verbis Cogidvmnv% & 
T)o B V N I. 5 Orig, Britan, p, 63. 
I 
