VI. 
( ;ci ) 
I. 
II. 
III. 
Names of Places. 
Toifes. 
Dunkirk. 
5 *o 
2* 
19N 
125454 
Amiens. 
49 
53 
56 
60444 
Clermont. 
49 
22 
57 
31028 
The R. Obfervatory. 
48 
5 o 
10 
0 
Voufon. 
47 
39 
*7 
67959 
IS* S. Sauvier. 
46 
13 
14 
*39937 
Croc. 
45 
5 * 
43 
169539 
Port. 
45 
13 
46 
196480 
Aurillac. 
44 
55 
>3 
223616 
Rodes. 
44 
20 
53 
156474 
Alby. 
43 
55 
3 i 
2806 1 2 
CarcaflTone. 
43 
12 
55 
321430 
Collioure. 
41 
31 
13 
360614 
IV. 
Seconds 
of a De- 
V. 
gree. 
Toifes. 
1 1 
4103 
65010 
1859 
29416 
1967 
3*028 
4 i 53 
67959 
4553 
71978 
1901 
29602 
1677 
26941 
* 7*3 
17136 
2060 1 
31858 
1 521 
14138 
1557 
40818 
2502 
39184 
Toifes, 
57040 
56965 
56787 
57515 
569 1 2 
56058 
57^34 
57018 
574H 
57 * 3 i 
5746 8 
56380 
In this Table in the third Column, over-againft St. 
Sauvier , the Number which was 139944 is correded 
to make it 139937, to the Advantage of the oblong Fi- 
gure. In the fixth Column, the Numbers appear fo ir- 
regular, as to be unfit to decide this Controverfy. Then 
if a Comparifon be made between "Dunkirk , St. Sauvier 
(which is very near the Middle of France , and almoft 
in the Meridian of Faris) and Collioure , the Meafure- 
ment is abfolutely in Favour of Sir Ifaac Newton's 
Theory ; the mean Degree between Dunkirk and St. 
Sauvier being larger by about 64 Toifes, than between 
S. Sauvier and Collioure , and to reduce them even to 
an Equality, there muft be a greater Alteration made 
in the Situation of thofe three Place?, than it is reafon- 
able to fuppofe their Ob fer vat ions to be capable of ad- 
mitting. Here follows the Comparifon. 
Dunkirk and Collioure 
Dunkirk and Fans 
Far is and Collioure 
Dunkirk and S. Sauvier 
S. Sauvier and Collioure 
f 5 7061 
j 56960 
A mean Degree is < 57097 
‘ 57090, 4 
57026,5 
L' ' 
According to Monf. Ficard ) 57060 
2 To 
