—36- 
paper on the “ Lejeuneae of the United States and Canada,” published in 
the eighth volume of the Memoirs of the Torrey Botanical Club, in iqo2. 
It is the fifth species of the Lejeuneae to be recorded from Canada, the 
others being Lejeunea cavifolia (Ehrh.) Lindb., L. patens Lindb. , Colo- 
lejeunea Biddleconiiae and C\ Macounii Evans. 
9. Frullania inflata Gottsche in G. L. & N. Syn. Hep. 424. 1845. Evans, 
Trans. Conn. Aead. 10 : 10. pi. y. 1897. 
Collected in August, 1899, at Cloudcroft, Sacramento Mountains, New 
Mexico, by E. O. Wooton, growing on the bark of an oak: also in July, 
1901, at Granite Falls, Minnesota, by J. A. Anderson {No. ^2), growing on 
rocks; also, in August, 1909, at Walnut, Fairfield County, Ohio, by E. G. 
Miller, growing on the bark of an elm. The three stations just recorded 
add considerably to the known range of the species. It bears a strong 
resemblance to the very common F. eboracensis Gottsche and is probably 
often confused with this species. It is very distinct, however, in its 
autocious inflorescence and in its leaf-cells, which show trigones but no 
intermediate thickenings. In F. eboi'acensis the inflorescence is dioicous 
and the leaf-cells have both trigones and intermediate thickenings, making 
the contours of the cell-cavities irregular. 
10. AnTHOCEROS LEVIS L. 
Collected in February, 1908, at Walsingham, Bermuda, by Stewardson 
Brown {No. 43d). Altho'ugh this is the first member of the Anthocerotales to 
be definitely recorded from Bermuda, an immature Anthoceros, apparently 
also A. levis, was collected on the island in 1900 by W. G. Farlow. 
Yale University. 
SOME LOPHOZIAS OF THE VENTRICOSA GROUP. 
Annie Lorenz. 
IRead at the Meeting of the Sullivant Moss Society at Boston, Dec. 30,1909.] 
The three species here discussed, Lophozia longide7is (Lindb.) Macoun, 
L. longipiora (Nees.) Schiffner, and L. co7ife7difolia Schiffner, have all been 
announced for New England by Dr. Evans in Rhodora, but as they have 
been hitherto but scantily figured, some figures and further notes on their 
distribution and characters may be of interest. 
The first two mentioned were originally considered as varieties of L. 
ve7itricosa, while the third approaches L. alpestris. But as they are quite 
distinguishable and constant in their typical forms, and each has its charac- 
teristic habitat, the modern tendency to segregation seems quite justified. 
