290 THE BOTANICAL EXCHANGE CLUB OF THE BRITISH ISLES. 
first of these, from Radnor, is a form of R. leucostachys , Sm. ( R. 
vestitus , Wh. and N.), with a little more armature than usual. The 
second is correctly named. — W. Moyle Rogers and E. F. Linton. 
Rubus villicaulis , Koehl. (R. calvatus , Blox.) I send specimens 
exactly answering to the plant thus named by Dr. Focke (Jour. Bot., 
1890, p. 129); — (1) from the West Cliff, Bournemouth, S. Hants, (where 
he saw it), July, 1890, and (2) from Rievaulx, N.E. Yorks, where I 
found it in great quantity (as also in the neighbouring parish of 
Nunnington) in August last. It is, I believe, the plant which Mr. 
J. G. Baker used to call “ North Country affinis ,” and certainly * 
differs in some respects from Bloxam’s calvatus , as gathered by Mr. 
J. E. Bagnall, in Warwickshire, and Rev. W. H. Purchas and Rev. 
W. R. Linton, in Derbyshire. But Dr. Focke calls them both good 
villicaulis forms ; and twice since his visit to Bournemouth, in 1889, 
he has written to say that he has seen “just our Bournemouth 
calvatus ” near Bremen. — W. Moyle Rogers. 
R. leucandrus , Focke. Alum Chine, Bournemouth, S. Hants ; 
3rd July, 1890. A luxuriant form which, in spite of the dark green 
leaves, appears essentially the same as the West Moors (Dorset) plant 
named leucandrus by Dr. Focke, in 1889. I sent it to him thus 
labelled, and he has returned it with the note, “ I believe that this 
form cannot be kept distinct from R. leucandrus New record for 
Vice-county. — W. Moyle Rogers. 
R. Lindebergii , P. J. Mull. Rievaulx, N.E. Yorks, 14th August, 
1890. Aysgarth, 1st September, 1890; and Askrigg, 6th September j 
M.W. Yorks. Stainforth, near Settle, N.W. Yorks, 10th September, 
1890. Named by Dr. Focke, as apparently identical with the 
continental plant. One of the commonest and most constant Rubi 
of the Yorkshire dales. During six weeks spent there last summer, 
I saw no other “ umbrosus ” form, except the very different one which 
Dr. Focke calls R. pulcherrimus , Neum. (R. polyanthemos , Lindeb.), 
and, in one place near Catterick Bridge, Richmond, a form which 
seems intermediate between the two. New record for all three Vice- 
counties ? — W. Moyle Rogers. 
R. polyanthemos , Lindebg.; Baker, = umbrosus , Bab., non W. and N. 
Hedges on the high road from Marple to Romiley, Cheshire, 30th 
August, 1890 ; hedgebank in the neighbourhood of Gateacre, South- 
west Lancashire, 13th September, 1890 . — Charles Bailey. “Right.” 
— W. Moyle Rogers. 
R. polyanthemos, Lindeb. Hulland Moss, S. Derbyshire, Septem- 
ber, 1889. Brailsford, S. Derbyshire, 9th August, 1889, and 16th 
August, 1890 . — Wm. R. Linton. Confirmed by Dr. W. O. Focke. 
R. macrophyllus , W. and N. ? ; Baker: On the high road skirting 
Cromarty Firth, north east of Dingwall, East Rossshire, 31st July, 
1890. None of the forms of macrophyllus are recorded for Co. 106 
in ‘Top. Bot.’ pp. 141, 142 . — Charles Bailey. “May go under 
R. SchlechtendaliiP — W. Moyle Rogers. 
R. Borreri , Bell. Salt, x vestitus W. and N. Edlaston, S. Derby- 
shire, October, 1889, and 1st Sept., 1890. On specimens submitted in 
1889, Dr. Focke said “remarkable form, group of vestitus .” In 1890 
