294 THE BOTANICAL EXCHANGE CLUB OF THE BRITISH ISLES. 
Rubus Lintoni , Focke ? (i) Rigg’s wood, 28th July, 1890, and (2) 
Woods near Belmont, Hereford, 18th Sept., 1890. This form is 
widely distributed in Herefordshire, generally or always in woods. 
I do not know whether Mr. Linton’s plant is always the very slender 
undeveloped-looking plant which the specimens which have reached 
me through the Club would lead me to suppose ; but if so, our Here- 
fordshire plant can hardly be the same thing ; for it often runs into 
robust very prickly, Koehleri-like forms, which however retain the 
peculiar shape of the leaflets both on barren stem and panicle. When 
robust, the barren stem forms a lofty arch. — A ugustin Ley. (i) “Very 
interesting to see R. Lintoni from Herefordshire, although it differs 
slightly.” — C. C. Babington. (2) “Certainly not Lintoni , but I can- 
not find out what to call it or where to place it.” — C. C. Babington. 
“ Dr. Focke does not name these. He appears to be of opinion, as 
I am, that neither of the plants is near enough to R. Lintoni , Focke, 
to go under that name, and that the two, though differing, are forms 
of one and the same bramble. Mr. Moyle Rogers also considers the 
two are the same thing.” — E. F. Linton. 
R. folio sus , Weihe. Rough ground, Little Doward Hill, Here- 
fordshire, 1 6th August, 1890 . — Augustin Ley. I have not been 
able to get any satisfactory opinion on this very interesting bramble. 
— E. F. Linton. 
R. . Haugh wood, Herefordshire, 19th August, 1890. This 
is the plant sent by me last year under the name of “ R. festivus , 
M. and W. ?” It is one of the most distinct-looking forms I am 
acquainted with. In the Haugh wood plant the petals were narrow 
and. white ; stamens white, and styles greenish-white. — A ugustin Ley. 
“ Near R. folio sus, Weihe.” — W. Moyle Rogers. On this opinion Prof. 
Babington remarks : — “Yes, but for the pronounced stem.” 
R. . Hulland, S. Derbyshire, 16th Sept., 1889. In 1889 
Dr. Focke put to a specimen of this, the name “poor pyramidalis , 
Kaltbg. ? ” I thought it might have some connection with R. folios us, 
Weihe. — W m. R. Linton. Dr. Focke, in the autumn of 1890, put 
specimens of this to R. fuscus , for me. — E. F. L. “ R. heteroclitus , 
Blox., under R. villicaulis , subordinate to R. adscitus .” — C. C. Babington. 
R. fuscus , W. and N. Hinton Admiral, 10th July, and Milton, 
S. Hants, 28th August, 1889. Thus named by Dr. Focke. A rather 
weak wood border form with some slight approach towards R. pallidus , 
W. and N. It extends for several miles along the outskirts of the 
New Forest in the parishes of Hinton, Milton, and Sway. — W. Moyle 
Rogers. 
R. pallidus , W. and N. New Forest, near Lyndhurst, S. Hants 
(T. R. Archer Briggs and W. Moyle Rogers), 17th July, 1890. 
Ouldray Gill, Helmsley, N.E. Yorks, 14th August, 1890. Name 
confirmed for both by Dr. Focke as “ very characteristic.” The 
N. E. Yorks plant also seen, and the name confirmed, by Professor 
Babington. New record for both Vice-counties. — W. Moyle 
Rogers. 
R. viridis, Kalt. Woods, Witley, 24th June, and (open ground 
state, a stouter plant) 18th September, 1890, Barnacle Hill Common, 
