298 THE BOTANICAL EXCHANGE CLUB OF THE BRITISH ISLES. 
Cocks and Glasbury, Breconshire, 9th Oct., 1890 . — Charles Bailey. 
“ R. surculosa, Woods.” — E. F. Linton. 
Rosa cLumalis , Bechst. • Baker. On the road between Malvern and 
Upton, near Drake-street, Worcestershire, nth Oct., 1890 . — Charles 
Bailey. “ Looks very like var. biserrata , Merat.” — E. F. Linton. 
“ R. biserrata , extreme dumalis .” — J. G. Baker. 
R. dumalis , Bechst. ; Baker. In Radnorshire, at Llandrindod, on 
hillside above the old church, 2nd Oct., 1890; and field hedge on the 
Ithon road, 4th Oct., 1890. — Charles Bailey. “ R. subcristata ) 
Baker. Sepals ascending, persistent.” — E. F. Linton. 
R. dumalis , Bechst. ; Baker. On the roadside, Llanwrtyd, near 
Cwm Irfon, Breconshire, 8th Oct., 1890. — Charles Bailey. “Like 
arvatica , but of the subcristate series. Is there a name for this ? ” — 
E. F. Linton. “ May be Watsoni '.” — J. G. Baker. 
R. arvatica , Baker ; or R. Watsoni , Baker ; Baker. A dwarf bush 
with small leaflets and slender prickles, in lane by the Free Church, 
Jamestown, south of Strathpeffer, East Rossshire, 29th July, 1890. — 
Charles Bailey. u R. tomentella? or Watsoni? scarcely arvatica .” 
— E. F. Linton. “Looks like tomejitella .” — J. G. Baker. “Cette 
forme ne peut etre rapportee ni au R. arvatica , ni au R. tomentella , ni 
au R. Watsoni. Cest vraisemblablement une variation du R. coriifolia 
a folioles un peu glanduleuses en dessous (glandes rougeatres et peu 
visibles). Les pedicelles sont un peu hispides. Pour certifier 
l’identite specifique de cette forme, il faudrait savoir quelle est Failure 
des sepales pendant la maturation des receptacles.” — F. Crepin. 
R. canina, L., var. psilophylla. , Rau. Form with ascending sepals. 
Longford, S. Derbyshire, 10th Sept., 1890. — W. R. Linton. “Chez 
certaines feuilles, la cote et le petiole sont pubescents, chez d’autres 
la cote et le petiole sont glabres. Je suis assez dispose a voir dans 
cette forme une variation glabrescente du R. tomentella , Lem.” — 
F. Crepin. 
R. subcristata , Baker ; Baker. On the Ithon Road near Rock 
House, Llandrindod, Radnorshire, 2nd Oct., 1890. — Charles Bailey. 
“Cannot be recorded on the specimens sent, as -R. subcristata. The 
sepals are mostly fallen ; the few that remain appear to be not sub- 
cristate. It may be R. verticillacantha , Merat, as the pedicels are 
bristly.” — E. F. Linton. 
R. (No. 252). Atlow, S. Derbyshire, 4th July and 22nd 
Aug., 1890. The same rose as is commented on in the 1888 Report 
under “ Rosa near Hognaston.” A canine-tomentose form, 
and therefore perhaps to be included in the group of R. coriifolia , Fr., 
as M. Crepin suggested.— W. R. Linton. (See next note.) 
R. (No. 253). Bradley, S. Derbyshire, 23rd Aug., 1890. 
Is this any named form of tomentosa ? — W. R. Linton. “ Curious 
form near Watsoni and BorreriP — J. G. Baker. On these two 
M. Crepin writes as follows: — “No. 253. Folioles assez abon- 
damment glanduleuses en dessous, a cote et a nervures secondaires 
pubescentes. No. 252. Folioles non glanduleuses en dessous, 
a cote et a nervures pubescentes ou seulement la cote pub- 
escente. A part la glandulosite des folioles, ces deux nume'ros 
