304 THE BOTANICAL EXCHANGE CLUB OF THE BRITISH ISLES. 
29th July, 1890 . — Augustin Ley. “ I believe this to be correctly 
named. Mr. Ley kindly sent it to me in the fresh state last year. It 
is a most interesting addition to the distribution of this species.” — F. 
J. Hanbury. 
Hieracium holopliyllum , n. sp. Cult., July, 1890. Original plant 
from Dovedale, Derbyshire. See Journal of Botany, Dec., 1890. — 
Wm. R. Linton. 
H. ccesium , Fr., var. Smithii , Baker. Near Buxton, Derby- 
shire, 1 6th June, 1890. Styles livid. — W. H. Painter. “This is 
unquestionably a murorum form, and quite off ccesium. This is not 
the plant I have from Dovedale and elsewhere, which for distinction 
I have called H. britannicum .” — F. J. Hanbury. 
H. Farrense , F. J. Hanb. Cult., Aug., 1890, from seed from 
north coast of Sutherland. Glen Shee, E. Perth, 19th July, 1889. 
Clova, Forfar, July, 1890. My brother suggested the name Farrense 
for these latter, though not regarding them as exactly typical. — W m. 
R. Linton. “ The Glen Shee plant I consider rightly named, 
though the leaves are more deeply toothed than in any of the coast of 
Sutherland specimens. On the one poor specimen from Clova, 
bearing only a single small stem leaf, I would rather not express an 
opinion ; the involucres appear similar, but the radical leaves 
different.” — F. J.. Hanbury. 
H. orarium , Lindeb. Railway cutting, Sellack, Herefordshire, 12th 
July, 1890 . — Augustin Ley. Great Orme’s Head, Carnarvonshire, 
9th July, 1890 . — Jno. E. Griffith. “I know this latter plant well, 
having gathered it in several counties of England. M. Arvet-Touvet, 
to whom I sent some Cheddar specimens of it, asking if he thought it 
should go to H. orarium , Lindeb., replied that he considered it a 
large and rather common form of H. vulgatum , Fr., and by no means 
H. orarium. In fact, one has only to place it side by side with 
Lindeberg’s type (Hier. Scand. exsicc.,. No. 85), to see how distinct 
the true H. orarium is from this plant, which I agree with M. Arvet- 
Touvet in regarding as best put under H. vulgatum ; though I think 
it may deserve description as a variety.” — E. F. Linton. 
H. vulgatum , Fr., form. Dove Craggs (2,500 feet), Fairfield, 
Westmoreland, Aug., 1890. — H. E. Fox. “I have similar plants 
from the “ Cheviots,” but prefer not attempting to name them at 
this moment ; though I think they are closely allied to H. ccesium.” — 
F. J. Hanbury. 
H. vulgatum , Fr., var, Yeldersley, S. Derbyshire, Aug., 1890. — 
Wm. R. Linton. A dark-headed vulgatum var. with broad blunt 
phyllaries : much the same as the Atlow H. diaphanoides , var., on 
which see note by Mr. F. J. Hanbury. — E. F. Linton. 
H. vulgatum , Fr., var. Brailsford, August, 1888 and 1890; Shirley, 
July, 1888; and Yeldersley, August, 1890; Derbyshire. The styles 
vary from dull yellow to yellow. Head and peduncles mostly with 
crowded setae. — W m. R. Linton. Of these, the Shirley plant was 
sent to M. Arvet-Touvet, who writes : — “ Forme de vulgatum rentrant 
dans la var. sciaphilum (H. sciaphilum , Uechtr.)” This is a very 
