REPORT FOR I 888. 
2I 5 
Rosa micrantha , Sm., var. Briggsii. Pedunculo nudo. Habitat ad 
margines agrorum juxta Woodspring, in comitatu Somersetsiensi, 
Sep., 1888. From the same bushes that have been twice supplied to 
the Club, and to which Mr. Briggs gave the name. — J. Walter 
White. “ Si je vois bien, ce n’est pas une var. du R. micrantha 
mais simplement une variation du R. agrestis, Savi. ( = R. sepium , 
Thuill.). — F. Crepin. This disposes of 512b of Lond. Cat.-— Ed. 
R. micrantha , Sm., var. Briggsii , Baker. Bank, Shalaford, Egg 
Buckland, S. Devon, July, 1888. I intended, last season, to get 
pieces of the plant in fruit, and showing the barren stem, to put with 
the flowering ones now sent, but unfortunately let the time slip by. — 
T. R. Archer Briggs. These did not reach the Editor in time to 
be sent to Monsieur Crepin. 
R. canina , L., var. dumalis (Bechst.). An extreme form, with 
glandular leaflets and aciculate peduncles, Bradley, Derbyshire, Sep- 
tember, 1888. — W. R. Linton. “Is verticillacantha , Merat.” — W. 
Moyle Rogers. “ Trop incomplet pour etre determine. Nervures 
secondaires glanduleuses.” — F. Crepin. 
R. canina , L., var. ‘between dumalis and subcristata] J. G. Baker. 
Shirley, S. Derbyshire, 30th August, 1888. — W. R. Linton. “Peut- 
etre, car je n’ose rien affirmer ; une var. du R. canina du groupe du 
R. dumalis — F. Crepin. 
R. canina , L., var. dumalis or subcristata. With petioles and mid- 
rib hairy, and sepals setose. Shirley, S. Derbyshire, July, 1887. — 
W. R. Linton. “ C’est une forme curieuse, mais pour se prononcer 
sur la place qu’elle doit occuper parmi les var. du R. canina , il faudrait 
des specimens plus complets. II parait y avoir parfois des glandes 
sur certaines nervures secondaires.” — F. Crepin. 
R. canina , L., var. subcristata , Baker. With sepals and peduncles 
setiose. Stydd, S. Derbyshire, 3rd October, 1888.” — W. R. Linton. 
This may be a weak form of subcristata , such as I have seen (very 
rarely) in the hilly parts of Devon ; but on the whole I should prefer 
placing it under verticillacantha , Merat.” — W. Moyle Rogers. “Trop 
incomplet pour bien juger.” — F. Crepin. 
R. canina , L. Leaflets doubly serrate, hairy on the upper surface ; 
sepals setose ; peduncles with occasional setae. Uig, Isle of Skye, 
August, 1888. — W. R. Linton. “ Appartient au Rosa glauca , Vill., 
variete appartenant a la division c. Biserra tce-compositce , a. Nudce , aa. 
Eglandulosoe ft Sep. gland. (Conf. ‘ Primitiae,’ p. 715.)” — F. Crepin. 
R. glauca , Vill., ‘form near Reuteri — J. G. Baker. Yeldersley, 
S. Derbyshire, 14th September, 1888.— W. R. Linton. “ Me fait 
reflet d’appartenir au R. glauca .” — F. Crepin. 
R. canina , L., (?) implexa (Gren.). Yeldersley, S. Derbyshire, 
September, 1888. — W. R. Linton. “ Globose fruited implexa , I 
think.” — W. Moyle Rogers. “ Appartient au groupe du R. tomentella , 
Lem.” — F. Crepin. 
R. ? “Goes under Watsoni it seems to me.” — J. G. Baker. 
Bradley, S. Derbyshire, 20th September, 1888. — W. R. Linton. 
“ Trop maigrement represente pour pouvoir etre bien juge. Pourrait 
fort bien etre une var. glanduleuse du R. coriifolia , Fries.” — 
F. Crepin. 
