lyS THE BOTANICAL EXCHANGE CLUB OF THE BRITISH ISLES. 
Menai Strait, near Bangor, Au^st, 1887.— J. E. Griffith. This 
only differs from the type in its aciculate peduncles ; it has been 
given no distinctive name. 
Rosa bivoliita^ Sm., van c. Doniana, Woods. Hedge at Woodloes, 
Warwick, July, 1887.— H. Bromwich. 
R. mvoluta, Sm., var. gracilis. Woods, thicket, Tachbrook, 
Warwickshire, July, 1887. — H. Bromwich. Professor Crepin reports 
on this, In my opinion this should not be placed under gracilis. 
In spite of the slightly curved prickles, I think it should be classed 
under Donia 7 iar 
R. hihernica., Smith, var. Grovesii., Baker. Barnes’ Common, 
Surrey, 17th June, 1876, and 25th September, 1880. Coll. H. and 
J. Groves. I send a few specimens of this, presuming that it is what 
is intended in the desiderata list by R. canma^ var. Grovesii^ as I am 
not aware of the existence of any variety of R. ca 7 iina of that name. 
— J. Groves. 
R. 7 nollissi 77 ia, var. glalrata., Fries. I have no more specimens 
of this rose, which I gathered at Strome Ferry, W. Ross, 30th July, 
1884, to send. But I would call the attention of members to the 
note which appeared on p. 106, in the Report of the Exchange Club 
for 1884, and say that any members who received a specimen of the 
rose I then sent in as R. 77 iollissi 77 ia^ Willd., from Strome Ferry, will 
have a specimen already of the rose now declared by Dr. W. J. 
Scheutz to be the var. glabrafa, about which a short paper from his 
pen has appeared in the March Xo. of ‘The Journal of Botany,’ 
1888. Always believing that the rose was a peculiar variety of R. 
iTiollisshjia^ I fortunately sent a specimen of it in company with 
another new variety I was submitting to him. — Edward F. Linton. 
R. i 7 ioUis. Sm. The Grove, Malvern Link, Worcestershire, 28th 
July, 1887. — R. F. Towndrow. “This form comes under my R. 
cuspidatoides. The leaflets are glandular 'beneath, whilst in true R. 
suhglobosa they are eglandular.” — F. Crepin. 
R. to 77 ie 7 itosa., Sm. Madresfield, ^Talvern, Worcestershire, 8th 
August, 1887. — R. F. Towndrow. According to Professor Crepin, 
the remarks on the preceding plant apply also to this. 
R. to 7716711 osa., Sm. var. Malvern Link, 12th August, 1887. — R. 
F. Towndrow. 
R. to 77 i 67 itosa., Sm. var. The Croft, West Malvern, 29th August, 
1887. — R. F. Tom^ndrow. 
i?., sp. Xear Shirley, Derbyshire, ist October, 1887. W. R. 
Linton. R. decipiens., Dum. (?) These three plants all belong to var. 
d. scabriusciila. IMr. Baker has passed them as R. scabriuscula, Sm., 
and the same determinations have been made by Professor Crepin. 
R. riibigiTiosa x 77 iicra 7 itha (?). Purley DoT\ms, Surrey, 1887. — 
Eyre de Crespigxy. Passed by Mr. Baker as R. Hystrix^ Leman. 
Professor Crepin writes, “ This approaches the form which Dese'glise 
has described under the name of R. Le 77 ia 7 iii {R. Hystrix, Lem.), 
but is not identical with it. It is rather the form described by 
Deseglise (without a name) under R. 77 iicra 7 itha (cnfr. ‘ Catalogue 
Raisonne',’ no. 342)-'’ 
