68 THE BOTANICAL EXCHANGE CLUB OF THE BRITISH ISLES. 
are those of R. leucostachys , Sm., almost typical ones. — T. R. 
Archer Brings. 
Rubus villicaulis, W. and N. Strawberry Hill, Clevedon, Somerset, 
28th Sept, 1882. — J. W. White. Such a portion of panicle is not 
suitable for distribution. Approaches R. leucostachys , Sm., and I 
think might be so named by some. The respective limits of these 
species were viewed differently by the late Rev. A. Bloxam and 
Professor Babington. — T. R. Archer Briggs. An untypical form of 
carpinifolius . — C. C. Babington. 
R. macrophyllus , Weihe, b. macrophyllus. Bishop’s Wood, High- 
gate, Middlesex, 1882. — E. de Crespigny. “Yes.” — C. C. Babington. 
R. mucronulatus , Blox. Kingcausie, Kincardineshire, Sept., 1882. 
J. T. Boswell. 
R. Sprengelii, Weihe. Cannock Chase, Staffordshire, July, 1882. 
J. Fraser. “ Yes.” — C. C. Babington. This seems to be satisfactory 
for Sprengelii. — T. R. Archer Briggs. 
R. Sprengelii, Weihe, b. Sprengelii. Hampstead Heath, Middlesex, 
1882. — E. de Crespigny. Specimens weak for determination, but I 
think correct. — T. R. Archer Briggs. Very nearly Borreri. — C. C. 
Babington. 
R. Koehleri , Weihe, var . pallidus. Yate Common, Gloucestershire, 
26th Sept., 1882. — J. W. White. The pieces seem different species; 
such a specimen as the panicle is useless. — T. R. Archer Briggs. 
Too bad to name ; not Koehleri. — C. C. Babington. 
R. Koehleri , Weihe. Hedge at Hare Cop Farm, near Alstonfield, 
N. Staffordshire, 1882. — W. H. Purchas. “ Pallidus .” — C. C. 
Babington. 
R. Kceheleri , var. infestus. Castlereagh Hill, Belfast, 26th July, 
1882. — S. A. Stewart. Apparently humifusus. — C. C. Babington. 
R. mutabilis, Genev. Harrow Weald Common, Middlesex, 1882. 
See Reports Bot. Rec. Club, 1880, and Bot. Ex. Club, 1879. — E. de 
Crespigny. Almost certainly R. Gunther i, Angl. = R. saltuum , 
Focke. — T. R. Archer Briggs. 
R. humifusus , Weihe. Harrow Weald Common, Middlesex, 
1882. See Report Bot. Rec. Club, 1880, p. 134. — E. de Crespigny. 
I am unacquainted with R. humifusus ; had it not been so labelled, I 
might have suspected it to be a form of R. Guntheri , Angl. =R. 
saltuum , Focke. — T. R. Archer Briggs. “ HystrixP — Prof. Babington. 
R. Reuteri , Merc. Sellack, Herefordshire, 24th August, 1882. 
I venture to transgress the second regulation of the club in sending a 
few specimens of this, with a view partly of obtaining some expressions 
of opinion upon it. It is a conspicuous member of the glandulose 
section of Rubus in the Ross neighbourhood, in which it is very 
abundant, standing clearly apart as well from ordinary glandulosus , 
Bell., as from diversfolius , Lindl., and Koehleri , Weihe ; and, as far 
as I am a judge, from familiarity with it in a growing state, certainly 
meriting a separate name The specimens I send belong, I believe, 
to the same form as that to which Prof. Babington gave the name of 
R. Reuteri first, though they are not from the same bush. — A ugustin 
Ley. * Yes.” — C. C. Babington. 
“ R. ccesius , var. tenuis ,” or “ a glabrous state of corylifolius.” 
Prof. Babington. Near the Westside, Alstonfield, N. Staffordshire, 
