30 THE BOTANICAL EXCHANGE CLUB OF THE BRITISH ISLES. 
Rubus leucostachys , Sm. Wavertree, S.W. Lancs., September, 
1880. — J. Harbord Lewis. Yes. — C. C. Babington. 
Rubus calvatus , Blox. Chandler’s Whin, near York, August, 
1880. — G. Webster. Seems to be near Hystrix, but the leaves are 
slightly felted. — C. C. Babington. 
Rubus macrophyllus , W. and N. Churchtown, S.W. Lancs., 
August, 1880. — J. Harbord Lewis. It closely agrees with the 
heteroclytus of Bloxam, but not of Muller, which is one of the 
Suberecti. I have placed Bloxam’s plant provisionally with villicaulis 
b. adscitus. — C. C. Babington. 
Rubus amplificatus, Lees. Binley, Warwickshire, August, 1880. 
J. E. Bagnall. I call it Schlechtendalii. — C. C. Babington. 
Rubus Bloxamii , Lees. Sutton Park, Warwickshire, August, 
1880. — J. E. Bagnall. Correct. — C. C. Babington. 
Rubus fusco-ater , Weihe. Welsh Newton Common, Hereford- 
shire, September, 1880 . — Augustin Ley. Probably correct. — C. C. 
Babington. 
Rubzis atro-rubens , Blox. Shelly, near Solihull, Warwickshire, 
September, 1880. The specimen I received through the Club in 
1880 was so unlike Mr. Bloxam’s original specimens, that I have 
thought it would be well to send specimens from bushes authenticated 
by Mr. Bloxam. This is an abundant plant in Warwickshire, and is, 
in my opinion, identical with the plant Mr. Bloxam pointed out to 
me near Twy cross, and Mr. Bloxam held the same opinion. — J. E. 
Bagnall. 
Rubus g/andu/osus, Sm. Wimbledon Common, Surrey, August, 
1880. — J. G. Baker. Of course, not R. glandulosus of Bellardi ; it 
is typical Koehleri. — C. C. Babington. 
Rubus Balfouricuius , Blox., var. Chandler’s Whin, near York, 
August, 1880. — G. Webster. May, I think, retain that name. — C. 
C. Babington. 
Rubus ulmifolius. Hedge, Grangehill, near Bishop Auckland, 
South Durham, 26th September, 1880. — J. P. Soutter. R . ccesius , 
c. ulmifolius. — C. C. Babington. 
Rosa , South Burn of Quoys, Hoy, Orkney, 12th August, 
1880. — H. Halcro Johnston. A form of R. mollissima , apparently 
stunted by exposure. — J. G. Baker. R. mollis ., var. coerulea , Baker? 
— A. Deseglise. 
Rosa mollisima , Willd. and var. coorulea , sent by Dr. Boswell 
from Hoy, Orkney. 
Rosa tomentosa , Sm., var. Woodsiana nobis. Bush erect, com- 
pact. Prickles slender, uniform, decidedly curved, those of the 
main stem 4-4 lines long, scar about 4 lines long. Leaves 
2j£-3 in. long and 2-2^ in. broad; petioles hairy and densely 
glandular; leaflets elliptic, the terminal 12-15 ^ nes l° n g an( ^ 6-9 
broad, thinly hairy above and hairy and slightly glandular beneath, 
serrature copiously compound. Flowers 1-3. Peduncles and 
calyx-tube glandular. Sepals persistent, becoming erect. Corolla 
small, pale pink. Styles slightly hairy. Fruit ellipsoid. A form 
nearly allied to R. scdbriuscula , from which, however, it differs by its 
smaller size, more compact habit, narrower leaflets with more 
compound serratures, more ellipsoid fruit, with decidedly erect 
