REPORT FOR I 885. 
127 
Rubus corylifolius , Sm. var. purpureus. St Weonard’s, Here- 
fordshire, August, 1885. — A. Ley. “Yes.” — C. C. Babington. 
R. althceifolius , Host About Berrow and Burnham, N. Somerset, 
August, 1885. Named with much diffidence, as the plant seems to 
be quite as near to tuberculatus , but does not well agree with either. 
This bramble is very robust and well marked, and grows abundantly 
over a large tract, several miles in extent, in the vicinity of Berrow 
and Burnham, N. Som. I have not observed it elsewhere. — J. W. 
White. “Yes = deltoideus, Mull.” — C. C. Babington. 
R. tuberculatus , Bab. Winters Cross, Peterstow, Herefordshire, 
August, 1885. — A. Ley. “Yes, but not typical.” — C. C. Babington. 
R. ccesius , L. var. Kingcausie, Kincardineshire, October, 1884. 
W. Irvine Fortescue. “ I have received this monstrous form for 
examination, and do not know what to do with it. It does not seem 
to belong to ccesius .” — C. C. Babington. 
R. ccesius , L., umbrosus. Dinmore, Herefordshire, July, 1885. — 
A. Ley. “Yes.” — C. C. Babington. 
R. ccesius , L., v. tenuis. Edgware, Middlesex, October, 1884. — 
W. R. Linton. “ R. ccesius , ulmifolius (Bab.) = ligerinus (Genev.)” — 
C. C. Babington. 
R. ccesius , L. v. ulmifolius. Buckden, Hunts., Sept 1885. — 
W. R. Linton. “ R. tenuis.”— C. C. Babington. 
R. ccesius , L. v. intermedins. Ballybunion, Kerry, 25th July, 
1885. — S. A. Stewart. “ I have placed somewhat similar specimens 
to ligerinus.” — C. C. Babington. 
R. ccesius , L. v. hispidus. Dinmore, Herefordshire, July, 1885. 
This I believe to be identical with a variety of R. ccesius , which I 
sent last year under the name of pseudo-Idceus, but which Professor 
Babington, in Report for 1884 (p. 106) refers to hispidus. — Augustin 
Ley. “ Surely a form of corylifolius , probably conj ungens.” — C. C. 
Babington. 
Rubus. Witley, Surrey, Sept., 1885. — W. R. Linton, “Some- 
what abnormal scaber , approaching Babingtonii.” — C- C. Babington. 
Rubus. Hadley Wood and Palmer’s Green, Middlesex, Sept., 
1885. — W. R. Linton. “I think that these are scaber, true.” — C. C. 
Babington. 
Rubus. Eltisley and Buckden, Hunts., Sept., 1885. — W. R. 
Linton. “ R. deltoideus , new L. C.” — C. C. Babington. 
Rubus. Ramsey, Hunts, Sept., 1885.— W. R. Linton. “ R. 
muiabilisf — C. C. Babington. 
Rosa scabriuscula , Sm. Roadside, between Ashbury and Beaworthy, 
N. Devon, 14th July, 1885. — W. Moyle Rogers. 
R. rubiginosa , sylvicola, De'segl. and Rip. Buckden, Hunts, 5th 
Sept., 1884. — W. R. Linton. “ I suppose so.” — J. G. Baker. 
R. micrantha , Sm., var. echinocarpa Ripart. Sprowston, E. 
Norfolk, July and Oct., 1885. — E. F. Linton. “ R. echinocarpa was 
described as a species and belongs to rubiginosa , not micrantha.” — J. G. 
R. dumalis , Bechst. Knypersley, Staffs., Aug., 1885. — W. H. 
Painter. “ I should label this R. inconspicua , Desegl.” — J- G. 
R. platyphylla , Rau. Biddulph, Staffs., Sept., 1885. — W. H. 
Painter. “Yes, a subvar. of urbica.” — J. G. Baker. 
