134 THE BOTANICAL EXCHANGE CLUB OF THE BRITISH ISLES. 
Symphytu?n tauricum , Willd. Pachbrook Grove, Warwickshire, 
June, 1885. — H. Bromwich. “ S. orientale.” — H. Groves. 
Pinguiculct, grandiflor a, Lam. Ben Bulben, Sligo, August, 1885. — 
— E. F. Linton. Cromagloun, Killarney, June, 1885. — S. A. Stewart. 
Chenopodium rubrum , L., var. pseudo-botryoides. Ross-links, 
Northumberland, August, 1885. — H E. Fox. “This is not such an 
extreme form as Mr. Watson’s plant.” — J. G. 
A triplex deltoidea , Bab., var. prostrata. Wells, Norfolk, W., Sept. 
1, 1885. This is the same plant which the Rev. W. R. Linton and 
myself sent up last year under the name A. triangularis, Willd. See 
Prof. Babington’s remark on it in the Report for 1884. — E. F. Linton. 
Rumex rupestris , Le Gall. St. Aubyn’s, Jersey, July, 1885 — A. 
Ley. 
Euphorbia hibcrna,\j. Cromagloun, Killarney, June 1885. — S. A. 
Stewart. 
Parietaria fallax, Thetford, Norfolk, June, 1885. — E. F. Linton. 
Also sent by Rev. W. R. Linton from same locality under the name 
of P, diffusa , var. erecta. “ The erect or spreading state of the plant 
seems of exceedingly little moment. The true erecta is quite a 
different plant = fallax? — C. C. Babington. 
Ulmus suberosa , Ehrh., var. glabra. Aylestone Hill, Hereford, 
Sept, 1885. — A. Ley. “As there are suberose forms of most of the 
species of elm, it is impossible to determine specimens from leaves 
alone ; fruit should in all cases be sent.” — G. Nicholson. 
U. suberosa , Ehrh., var. stricta. Planted trees, Aylestone Hill, 
Hereford, Sept., 1885. — A. Ley. “Cannot be identified specifically 
with certainty without fruit.” — G. Nicholson. 
Quercus Robur, L., var. intermedia l Carey, Herefordshire, Sept., 
1885. — A. Ley. “ This must come under Q. sessiliflora if two species 
are kept up. It is impossible to arrange the British oaks into three 
sets. Q. pedunculata and Q. sessiliflora are in the typical condition.” 
— G. Nicholson. 
Betula alba , L., var. verrucosa. Hounslow Heath, Middlesex, 
May, 1885. — W. R* Linton. “ I should say this is correctly named, 
but fruit is far too young.” — G. Nicholson. 
Populus tremula , L., var. glabra. E. Finchley, Middlesex, April 
and June, 1885. — W. R. Linton. “This I should call viliosaP — G. 
Nicholson. Epping Forest, Essex, April and May, 1885. — W. R. 
Linton. “ Correctly named.”— G. Nicholson. Thorpe, E. Norfolk, 
May and July, 1885. — E. F. Linton. ‘Correctly named.” — G. 
Nicholson. 
Salix, sp. Malvern Link, Worcestershire, May and Aug., 1885. 
I cannot help regarding this as Russelliana , which has been stated 
only to occur as the female tree in Britain. It certainly differs much 
in its catkins from S. fragilis proper. In the plant sent the catkins 
are much more . slender and not frequently forked, as in that species ; 
they also want the long shaggy scales characteristic of S. fragilis. 
The leaves of this plant agree well with those of female specimens 
accepted by the Rev. J. E. Leefe as Russelliana. — R. F. Towndrow. 
Salix alba , L., var. ? New Pool, Malvern Wells, Worcestershire, 
May and Sept., 1885. The catkins much shorter and stouter than 
