248 THE BOTANICAL EXCHANGE CLUB OF THE BRITISH ISLES. 
Rubus rhamnifolius , W. and N. ; Baker. Hedge near the Railway 
Station, Chatburn, S. Lancashire, 23rd September, 1889 . — Charles 
Bailey. “Is not this R. ramosus , Blox. in one of its forms?”— 
C. C. Babington. 
R., doubtful between rhamnifolius , and umbrosus ; Baker. Hedge 
at roadside in the neighbourhood of Mere, Cheshire, 31st August, 
1889 . — Charles Bailey. “Is it not R. Muenteri, to which (combined 
with R. Maassii) my umbrosus will go?” — C. C. Babington. “I am 
inclined to put it under umbrosus , although I cannot find clear limits 
between the two forms.” — Dr. W. O. Focke. 
R. incurvatus , Bab. ; Baker. Side of lane in the neighbourhood of 
Knutsford, Cheshire, 31st August, 1889. New County record. — 
Charles Bailey. “I consent to this determination.” — Dr. W. O. 
Focke. “ Where is the felt ? I think it must be referred to R. 
nemoralis (Miill.), probably under its form R. Maassii , or very near to 
it.” — C. C. Babington. 
R. incurvatus, Bab. ; Baker. Open spaces in a disused slate 
quarry, Glyn, near Llanberis, Carnarvonshire, 14th September, 1888. 
Quarry wharf, Llyn Padarn, in the neighbourhood of Llanberis, Car- 
narvonshire, . 15th September, 1888 . — Charles Bailey. “These 
apparently are R. incurvatusP — C. C. Babington. 
R. - -. Abundant in Lyonshall park w r ood, 18th July, 1889. 
I believe this to fall under 435, R. montanus , Wirtg. It much 
resembles a plant sent by me to the Club in 1885 under the name of 
R. Salteri, Bab., but referred by Professor Babington to R. montanus , 
Wirtg. See Report, 1885, p. 125. It is also very near a plant sent 
under the name of R. adscilus, Gen., in 1886, which the same 
authority placed to R. rusticanus , Merc. See Report, 1886, p. 148. — 
Augustin Ley. “ Is it not the R. thyrsoideus fragrans of Focke from 
Shirley, Derbyshire, of Messrs. Linton and Purchas (15th August, 
1889)?” — C. C. Babington. 
R. pubesce?is, W. and N. ; Baker. On the road to Wookey, in 
the neighbourhood of Wells, North Somerset, 12th July, 1889. 
New County record? — C harles Bailey. “ R. argentatus, P. J. 
Miill.” — Dr. W. O. Focke. “It is not like my authentic specimen 
of argentatus in Herb. Genevier. I have the plant from Weissenberg j 
referred to by Focke, on page 198, and it can hardly be the same, j 
neither do I call it R. pubescensP — C. C. Babington. 
R. pubescens, W. and N. ; Baker. Road to Charmouth, in the 
neighbourhood of Lyme Regis, Dorsetshire, 10th July, 1889. New 
County record? — C harles Bailey. “I think so.” — C. C. Babington. j 
“ R. argentatus , P. J. Miill.” — Dr. W. O. Focke. 
R. macrothyrsos , J. Lange. Flor. Dan. tab. 2832. Near Bangor, 
August, 1889. — J. E. Griffith. “Of course Focke’s determination 
(Rep. 1888, p. 211) must stand. I place it under R. vestitusP — 
C. C. Babington. 
R. pubescens , W. and N. ; Baker. Roadside near Dolbadarn | 
Castle, in the neighbourhood of Llanberis, Carnarvonshire, 14th 
September, 1888. New County record. — C harles Bailey. “No, ( 
I think it is R. villicaulis ; it seems just like the plant so-named 
