REPORT FOR 1889* 
261 
Rosa canina , Linn., var. implexa (Gren.). Shirley, S. Derbyshire, 
3rd August, 1889, “Too young to be sure whether really sect. 
Subcristatce .” — J. G. Baker. 
R. coriifolia , Fries, var. Lintoni , N. J. Scheutz. Braemar, Aber- 
deen, 27th July, 1889. We send specimens of this rose, which was 
named by Dr. Scheutz, and described by him in the Journal of Botany 
(Yol. xxvi., p. 67). — E. F. & W. R. Linton. 
R. coriifolia , Fr. var. Bradley, S. Derbyshire, 19th August, 1889. 
Named coriifolia by Mr. J. G. Baker in 1888, but differs from the 
type by its setose sepals, and occasionally aciculate peduncles. — 
W. R. Linton. 
R. Watsoni, Baker. Bush on the hill near the Rutherford 
obelisk, Gatehouse of Fleet, Kirkcudbrightshire, 19th September, 
1889. New County record. — Charles Bailey. 
R. canina , Linn. var. Watsoni , Baker. Bradley, S. Derbyshire, 
9th September, 1889. This rose was referred to Watsoni by Mr. J. 
G. Baker, and to coriifolia by M. Crepin in 1888. See Report for 
1888, p. 215. My own strong opinion is that we have here not R. 
canina but a form of R. tomentosa , Sm. — W. R. Linton. 
R canina , Linn., var. Bradley to Kniveton, S. Derbyshire, 7th 
August, 1889. Twigs wine-red, leaflets rounded at the base, sepals 
inclined to ascend. — W. R. Linton. On this and the following 
plant Mr. Baker remarks: — “Too young to be sure if sect. 
Subcristatce .” 
R. canina , , Linn., var. Shirley, S. Derbyshire, 31st August, 
1889. This plant might at first sight be mistaken for R.glauca, Vill., 
which grows two fields away, and is specifically distinct and to be 
ranked not under but coordinate with canina. I should place this 
plant in a subcristate section of the lutetiana group. — W. R. Linton. 
R. arvensis , Huds , var. Atlow, S. Derbyshire, nth September, 
1889. Bush weak and trailing, few flowered; leaflets deeply cut 
and serrate; fruit rather small and oblong. — W. R. Linton. “ R. 
arvensis .” — J. G. Baker. 
R. arvensis , Huds., var. gallicoides (Desegl). Near Ashbourne, 
Derbyshire, 21st September, 1889. W. R. Linton. “I suppose 
gallicoides is a hybrid. This is much nearer arvensis than Bromwich’s 
plant.” — J. G. Baker. 
R. arvensis , Huds., var. bibracteata (Bast.)? Bradley, S. Derbyshire, 
17th August, 1889. Bush robust and luxuriant. If correct this is 
a new County record. — W. R. Linton. “Doubtful if bibracteata .” — 
J. G. Baker. 
R. arvensis , Huds., var. reptans Crep. Hollington, S- Derbyshire, 
1 2th October, 1889. A similar plant was so named by M. Crepin 
in the 1887 Report. — W. R. Linton. “I should call this simply 
arvensis .” — J. G. Baker. 
R. arvensis , Huds., var. Chesterton Wood, Warwickshire, July, 
1889. — H. Bromwich. “Yes.” — J. G. Baker. 
Saxifraga hirsuta , Linn. Root from Brandon Mountain, Kerry, 
cult., Sellack, Herefordshire, 1st June, 1889. — Augustin Ley. 
“ Hirsuta is merely a Geum variety.” — J. G. Baker. 
