104 THE BOTANICAL EXCHANGE CLUB OF THE BRITISH ISLES. 
suberectus , Ands., with an inclination towards the latter determination. 
I fail to understand hemistemon , of which Mr. Bagnall has favoured me 
with specimens.” — T. R. Archer Briggs. “ Seems right.” — J. G. Baker. 
Rubus hemistemon. Warwick, 8th July, 1884. — J. Bagnall. 
“ Hemistemon , var. staminib. longioribus.”— Dr. Focke. 
R. affinis , W. et N. Harrow Weald Common, 1883 . — Eyre de 
Crespigny. “ R. geniculatus, Kaltenb.” — Dr. Focke. This is placed 
by Nyman under pubescens , Wh., and Focke’s geniculatus is referred to 
carpinifolius , Wh. 
Rubus Lindleianus , Lees. Putney, Surrey. — E yre de Crespigny. 
“Yes.” — Dr. Focke. 
Rubus imbricatus , Hort. Hole in the Wall, Sept., 1884. — W. H. 
Purchas. “ Yes.” — C. C. Babington. 
Rubus leucostachys , Smith. Putney Heath, Surrey, 1883 . — Eyre 
de Crespigny. “Near R. conspicuos , P. J. Mu ell,” — Dr. Focke. 
R. Salteri. Hone Hill, Hereford, 8th Sept., 1884. — A. Ley. “I 
think this is carpinifolius. I do not remember having seen Salteri 
with such a panicle, or its leaves with such teeth.” — C. C. Babington. 
U R. rhombifolius , Wh., or very near it.” — Dr. Focke. A sub-sp. of 
villicaulis. R. vulgaris , var. d. rhoinbifolius , W. et N. Rubi Ger., p. 
38-40. R. carpinifolius , var. b. roseus , W. et N. Rubi Ger., p. 36. 
Rubus villicaulis. Woods near Witney, Hereford, 15th Oct., 1884.. 
A. Ley. “ Yes.” — C. C. Babington. “R. silvaticus , W. and N. Rubi 
Germ., p. 41, 1825.” — Dr. Focke. 
Rubus ' Salteri ? Bab., calvatus ? Putney Heath, Surrey, 1883. 
Eyre de Crespigny. “ R. villicaulis , Koch, var.” — Dr. Focke. 
Rubus adscitus. Llanberis — J. E. Griffith. “ Imperfect.” — C. 
C. Babington. “ Incomplete specimen ” — Dr. Focke. 
R. tuberculatus , approaching corylifolius. Builingham, 2nd Oct,, 
1884. — A. Ley. “No \ pampinosus, Lees.” — C. C. Babington. 
Rubus Borreri, Bab. Earl Wood, Warwick, 9th Aug., 1884. — J. 
Bagnall. Mr. Briggs makes the same note under this as the 
“Atherstone Outwoods” specimens, and also to those from “ Berk- 
well’s Warwick, 16th Aug., 1884. — J. Bagnall.” 
Rubus Sprengelii , Weihe. Hampstead Heath, Middlesex, 1883. 
Eyre de Crespigny. “Yes.” — Dr. Focke. 
Rubus Sprengelii , Borreri. Berkwell Woods, 16th Aug., 1884. — 
J. E. Bagnall. “ Borreri ’.” — C. C Babington. 
Rubus Borreri. Atherstone Outwoods, Warwick, 4th August, 1884. 
— J. E. Bagnall. “Certainly under agg. Sprengelii , W., of Babington, 
and I suppose sufficiently large and luxuriant to be considered the 
var. a. Borreri rather than the restricted Sprengelii constituting var. 
b.” — T. R. Archer Briggs. “ R. Sprengelii .” — Dr. Focke. 
Rubus Borreri. Quamford, 22nd August, 1884.— W. H. Purchas. 
“ Scarcely separable from true Sprengelii. — C. C. Babington. “ R. 
Sprengelii. ” — Dr. F ocke. 
Rubus Hystrix. Hampstead Heath, Middlesex, 1883 — Eyre de 
Crespigny. “ Yes.” — Dr. Focke. This is not given for “ Brit.” by 
Nyman, but seems to be well understood enough by our Bramble 
Students. I have, gathered it in Surrey quite coinciding with the 
specimens determined by Dr. Focke. 
