REPORT FOR 1 884. 
!05 
Rubus Lejeunii. Putney Heath, Surrey, 1883. — Eyre de Cres- 
pigny. U R. rosaceus, Weihe and N.” — Dr. Focke. 
Rubus Radula. Perivale, Middlesex, 1883. — Eyre de Crespigny. 
“ Yes.” — Dr. Focke. 
Rubus rudis , Wh. Somerset, 6th June, 1884. — J. W. White. 
“ R. echinatus , Lindl., not rudis of W. and N.” — Dr. Focke. Nyman 
gives echinatus as a var. of R. radula, Wh., with “ Brit.” only U R. rudis, 
Bab., sec. Focke,” as a synonym, and places R. Leightoni , Lees, 
under R. rudis, Wh. and N. 
Rubus Kcehleri , verus. Kington, Hereford, 27th August, 1884. — 
A. Ley. “ This is essentially the same as a Devon and Cornwall 
bramble which I have noticed for some years past ; though the Rev. 
A. Ley’s specimens are more prickly. It is not what I regard as 
typical, being, as I think, as near var. infestus. At present I know no 
better arrangement than to place it as a form or var. of aggregate 
Kcehleri of Babington’s Manual, The light hue of the leaflets beneath 
and their formal outline are noticeable features.” — T. R. Archer Briggs. 
“ Yes.” — Dr. Focke. 
Rubus Kcehleri, pallidus. Highgate Woods, Middlesex, 1884. 
Eyre de Crespigny. “R. Kcehleri , not pallidus , Wh.” — Dr. Focke. 
Rubus infestus. St. Weonards, Hereford, 30th Aug., 1884. — A. 
Ley. “I think is pallidus.' , ' > — C. C. Babington. “ R. Kcehleri, W . 
and N., not infestus, Wh.” — Dr. Focke. 
R. Kcehleri, verus. Park Wood, Hereford, 27th Aug., 1884. — A. 
Ley. “This, I think, is infestus.”- — Dr.‘ Focke. 
Rubus cavatifolius. Trellack, Hereford. — A. Ley. “Yes.” — C. 
C. Babington. “ I do not know cavatifolius .” — J. G. Baker. “ Near 
R.fuscus, W. & N. and R. mutabilis, Genev.” — Dr. Focke. 
Rubus pyramidalis, Bab. Great Doward, Hereford, 28th Aug., 
1884. — A. Ley. “ May do for pyramidalis .” — J. G. Baker. “ Very 
weak and uncharacteristic pyramidalis?' — C. C. Babington. 
R. pyramidalis, Bab. Llanberis, July, 1884. — J. E. Griffith. 
“ Much better pyramidalis than the Hereford.” — C C. Babington. 
“ The panicles here are clearly two of pyramidalis, but the barren 
shoot is, I believe, some other species.” — T. R. Archer Briggs. “ R . 
longithyrsiger, Lees, pyramidalis, Bab.” — Dr. Focke. See “Babington 
Journal of Botany,” 1878, p. 177, for Lees’ name, although he does 
not adopt it in the 8th edition of the Manual. 
Rubus Purchasii, Blox. “Unknown to me.” — Dr. Focke, See 
Babington, Journal of Botany, 1878, p. 208. I can find no mention 
of this in the 8th edition of the Manual. 
Rubus corylifolius , var. Acomb, York, July, 1884. — G. Webster. 
“ Sublustris with very coarsely dentate leaves.” — G C. Babington. 
“ Corylifolius, var. ? Sepals erect.” — Dr. Focke." 
Rubus corylifolius, conjungens. St. Weonards, Hereford, 12th Aug., 
1884. — A. Ley. “ Conjungens = BalfourianusP — C. C. Babington. 
“ R. corylifolius, Smith.” — Dr. Focke. 
Rubus corylifolius , conjungens. Uig, Skye, 6th Aug., 1884. — E. F. 
Linton. “ Conjungens = tuberculatus = scabrus, Mull, Genevier.” — C. 
C. Babington. 
Rubus corylifolius, Sm. Hulme End, Alstonfield, August, 1884.- - 
