24 
reproduction and "... getting into an area pf creation that is 
the province of God." Such changes could be effected by direct 
manipulation of genetic material of zygotes or by indirect 
alteration of reproductive cells in adults during treatment of 
other inherited disorders. 
In actuality, the positions of these two groups are not 
as divergent as appears at first glance. Both groups support 
the concept of gene splicing as "therapy" for treatment of 
congenital diseases. The disagreement occurs on the issue of 
altering reproductive cells for the prevention of inherited 
disorders. The resolution most recently adopted by a group of 
religious leaders condemns any experimentation that could alter 
traits inherited by future generations. The statement from the 
President's Commission reflects a balanced view of the potential 
benefits of such rDNA procedures with the voiced concern o-f 
potential problems and the recommendation for close scrutiny of 
research in this area. 
B. Concerns About Social and Biological Consequences 
There are some who object to genetic engineering because 
it interferes with the "wisdom of evolution." They view species 
lines as naturally protective barriers that should not be crossed 
because of potential serious* consequences . Others are concerned 
about the loss of "heterozygote advantage", the protection that 
varied characteristics offer for survival of a species. While 
long-term effects are the most difficult to anticipate, these 
[ 625 ] 
