Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) 
Guidelines, 36 Eli 205150 (August 1, 1973), 
promulgated by tlie Secretary or any of the 
officers named in 30-13-30A would signi- 
ficantly affect the environment unless the 
legislative item is accompanied by an 
environmental statement pertaining there- 
to that conforms to 01500. o of the CEQ 
Guidelines, as amplified or implemented 
by Department guidelines." 
* * * 
”30-13-60 MODIFICATION AND WAIVERS 
A. Assistant General Counsel for Legislation 
May Modify or Waive Application of Regu- 
lation for Good Cause in Particular Cases." 
jfc 
49* Neither a draft EIS or a final EIS was prepared by the 
defendants or any of them on the proposed legislation set forth 
in Paragraph 45* 
50. The proposed legislation set forth in Paragraph 45 has 
and will have profound short and long-term effects upon the 
quality of the human environment and upon the maintenance of a 
productive and enjoyable harmony between man and his environment 
and will have profound effects on the health and welfare of 
present and future generations over the entire planet. 
51. There is no good cause for failing to prepare an 
environmental impact statement on the part of the defendants. 
52. In the conception and development of the proposed 
legislation referred to in Paragraph 45 and its transmittal to 
Congress, the defendants have violated and disregarded the 
decisionmaking processes required by NEPA, Executive Order 11514, 
the CEQ Guidelines and the DHEW GAM, in that defendants, among 
other things, have failed to prepare a detailed statement of 
environmental impacts, alternatives and other matters required 
by NEPA with respect to this proposed legislation, which consti- 
tutes a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality 
of the human environment. 
22 
[B-241 
