and NEPA, and otherwise not in accordance v;ith law, and that 
said Guidelines arc invalid, inapplicable and without force and 
effect . 
E. Enjoining and restraining defendants from each and 
every of the actions and determinations in "A" above. 
F. Granting an order directing defendants to suspend those 
grants and portions of grants which have been made for the 
purpose of conducting recombinant DNA research. 
G. Enjoining and restraining the construction and/or 
renovation of facilities for the conduct of recombinant DNA 
research presently in progress or proposed. 
I 
H. Mandating the defendants to study and determine the 
environmental and health effects of the actions described 
above, and of each of them, and to develop alternatives thereto, 
I 
! as required by Sections 2, 101, and 102 of NEPA, and on the 
il 
basis of that study and assessment, to adopt that course 
which most conforms to NEPA’s policies. 
I. Declaring that the authority and policies of the NIH 
are not in conformity with the intent, purposes, and procedures 
set forth in NEPA, the CEQ Guidelines, and the DHE17 GAM. 
J. Mandating that the defendants bring the authority and 
policies of the NIH into conformity with the intent, purposes, 
and procedures set forth in NEPA, the CEQ Guidelines, and 
DHEW GAM. 
K. Declaring that in taking the actions and determinations 
set forth in "A" above, defendants have not, to the fullest 
extent possible,, executed and administered the policies, regu- 
lations and public laws with the execution and administration of 
which they are charged, in accordance with the policies set 
; forth in NEPA, and the said action arc accordingly, arbitrary. 
L. Declaring that the membership of the Recombinant DNA 
Molecule Program Advisory Committee is not fairly balanced, 
3d 
[B-40] 
