20 
original subgroup draft document (Attachment IV). She asked the irking group 
to comment on the language of part IV. Dr. Pirone suggested that Section IV-A-2 
refer to the "immediate surroundings" of the test location. Dr. McGarrity 
sugoested language requiring monitoring data be reported to RAC be included in 
Section IV-D. 
Dr. Gottesman said the working group document should ask vhetlier ecological 
data on the trial site pertinent to the review exist. Dr. Pramer suggested 
the document should specifically request a description of trial site character- 
istics which might affect dispersal of the test organism. 
Dr. Lacy asked the working group whether they thought a surrmary (part V) is 
necessary in the draft document. Drs. Gottesman, Tolin, and Pirone agreed that 
a concise s urinary would be useful. Dr. Pramer thought quantitative limits 
such as precision and accuracy could be discussed in the summary. 
Dr. McGarrity asked the working group vhat procedure should be followed in 
developing the draft document (Attachment XI) for presentation to RAC. 
Dr. Gottesman said she would add language describing the logical framework of 
the document. She moved that the draft document then be sent as an interim 
version to the October 29, 1984, RAC meeting for comment. Drs. Pramer and 
Tolin seconded the motion. The working group accepted the motion by a vote of 
eleven in favor, none opposed, and no abstentions . 
r Executive Secretary's Note: The draft interim version of the document developed 
by the Working Group on Release into the fhvironment at the October 5, 1984, 
meeting is appended to these minutes as Attachment XIV. ] 
Dr. McGarrity asked the working croup if they might reconvene on October 30, 
1984, to continue work on the document. The working group agreed to meet on 
that date if Dr. Milewski cculd arrange for the meeting in the time available. 
Dr. McGarrity adjourned the October 5, 1984, meeting of the Working Group on 
Release into the Environment at 4:40 p.m. 
Respectively submitted 
[ 30 ] 
