•• J+5S- 
E. W. Dunnan, et al. (August 19): Present in Washington County during 
the entire season, hut not touch damage done* 
Texas. * K. P. Ewing, et al. (August 5): In examining 3,900 cotton terminals in lU 
fields of late-planted cotton in the vicinity of Waco, McLennan' County, dur 
ing the week, 903 eggs were found, the number of eggs per 100 terminal 
buds in these fields ranging from 5»0 to 72.3, with on average of 23*2 eggs 
per 100 terminals. Average ’per 100 terminals for last week was 9»3 mnd for 
the week ending July 22 was 7»H, showing a very marked increase in ovi- 
position in late-planted cotton. 
C. R. Parencia and S. E. Joneg (August 5)*. Heavy infestation observed ir 
one field in Calhoun County. 
A. J. Chapman (August 12 ): Considerable damage in spotted locations in 
•Presidio County. Damage more apparent in the later planted cotton* 
Arizona. W. A. Stevenson (August 19) i Recent examination of one field of short- 
staple cotton near Tubac, Santa Cruz County, showed 5*2 percent of the 
bolls to be injured, 
COTTON LEAP WORM ( Alabama argillacea Hbn. ) 
Georgia. L. W, Morgan (August 25) t A few found in Echols* County but no great 
amount of damage, 
4 • 
Florida. C. S. Rude and assistants (August 12): A few in many fields in Alachua, 
Union, Marion, and Lake Co\inties, but they seemed to have been held in 
check by some factor, (August 26): Cotton in part of Gilchrist County 
stripped of tender parts. Moths migrating from those fields. 
Mississippi. C.- Lyle (August 2b): The first larvae found in Mississippi were on 
July 29 in George County* later found in Jackson County. On August l4 re- 
ported from Washington County and on the sane date found generally dis- 
tributed in Tate County. Larvae found at State College on August 17* 
Recent investigations in George County showed that parasites had prevented 
much of the expected damage.. 
Louisiana, C. 0. Eddy (August 23) S- Abundant in local areas in northern Louisians, 
R. C. Gaines and assistants (August 26): So far as is known no control 
is necessary in Madison Parish. In Richland Parish considerable ragging 
of cotton reported, necessitating treatment. 
Texas, F. L. Thomas (August 9)i Less damaging than in the last several years. • 
Larvae have appeared in Kaufman County, northern Texas, Runnels County, 
west-central Texas, and at Presidio, in the Big Bend, but no ragging caused 
except in a few locations, (August l6): Severe ragging in the coastal 
bend region, and control measures general in the upper coastal area, with 
some control being used as far north as McLennan County, 
