Encrini and Pentacrini discovered near Bristol. 91 
Plate A, Fig . 1 and 2. 
These two figures represent the two sides of a specimen found 
by me in September, 1816, near to Clevedon; and in order to make 
out its detail with accuracy, I have made the drawings somewhat 
larger than the size of the original. It was found nearly buried in 
a mass of very hard limestone of a grey colour. 
Plate 4, Fig. 3 
Is a considerable fragment of another species, a little larger than 
the original, which I have cleared as well as I could from a silicified 
stone rolled on the beach. It is interesting, as having the stem. 
Plate 4, Fig . 4 and 5. 
This specimen exhibits the upper joints of the stem of a penta- 
crinus, and the commencement of two of what appear to be the 
arms. It was found in a wall at Shipham, near Axbridge, in Somer- 
setshire, by Mr. Morgan. Fig. 5 shews the natural size. 
Plate 4, Fig . 6 and 7. 
This specimen was found in a magnesian sandstone in Clevedon 
Bay, by Mr. W. Morgan, in August, 1816. Fig. 7 represents the 
natural size. 
1 ' .u - •< ' i ' . ».! i • .v i i \ ■' *1; ■ _ i'. - > cjlSU 
Plate 4, Fig . 8, 9, 10, and 11. 
This beautiful specimen was found at the same time and place as 
the preceding, only a very small part of it being visible. Having 
by much care and labour succeeded in developing it, I immediately 
made the accompanying drawing. The specimen had so much 
symmetry and was so beautifully perfect in all its parts, as to appear 
artificially carved. Unfortunately Mr. Morgan has since injured it 
m 2 
