- 309 - 
Indiana Positive ©vid ' of tha presence ef this insect was found in 
Warrick, Vanflerburg, and Knox Counties in the southwestern corner 
of the State. 
Tennessee Positive evidence of the presence of the Oriental peach moth was 
found in Henry, Gibson, Madison, Dixon, Davidson, Williamson, 
Rutherford, Maury ; Bedford, Lawrence, Franklin, Hamilton, Bradley, 
Monroe, Loudon, Knox, Hamblen, Greene, Washington, and Sullivan 
Counties. Examinations made in McMinn and Coffee Counties failed 
to show the presence of this insect. The distribution in this 
State is general. 
Alabama. "' Positive evidence of the Oriental peach roth was found throughout 
this State, records having been received from Madison, Etowah, 
Calhoun, Jefferson, Shelby, Dallas, Butler, Montgomery, Pike, Lee, 
Escambia, and Mobile Counties. Examinations made in Baldwin, 
Clarke, Monroe, Marengo, Bullock, Macon, Cullman, Morgan, and 
Limestone Counties failed to give evidence of this pest. 
Mississippi Adults were reared or typical injury observed in the following 
Counties: DeSoto, Marshall, Tishomingo, Lee, Coahoma, Clay, Wash- 
ington, Hinds, Lauderdale, Forrest, Pearl River, Harrison, and 
Jackson Counties. Examinations made in Pike, Lincoln, Jones, 
Madison, Oktiobeha, Lowndes, Leflore, Sunflower, and ^lcorn Coun- 
ties failed to shew evidence of this pest. 
Louisiana Examinations made in Caddo, Webster, Jefferson, and Orleans Parish- 
es failed to show evidence of the presence of this pest in Louisiana. 
Missouri The only examinations made in this State were carried on in McDonald 
County where typical injury of Oriental peach moth was ooserved. 
Arkansas A very comoiete survey was carried on in this State and ocsitive 
evidence of the presence of this pest seemed to be confined to the 
Counties along the Mississippi River. The following Counties were 
found to be infested: Mississippi, Cross, Lee, Phillips, and Desha 
Counties. What appeared to be typical injury by this pest was 
observed in Pulaski County in the center of the State. V 7 hat ap- 
peared to be this insect was collected in Bentonville, in the north- 
western c&mer oi the State, but up to the time of the report the moth 
had not been reared. A survey carried on in Carroll, Boone, Newton 
Washington, Crawford, Johnson, Polk, Searcy, Franklin, Sebastian, 
Garland, Sevier, Howard, Pike, Clark, Dallas, J ^i ferson, Cleveland , 
Bradley, Ouachita, Hempstead, Miller, Pope, Lafayette, Columbia, 
Union, Drew, Ashley, Chicot, St. Francis, Jackson, and Craighead 
Counties failed to show evidence of the presence of this insect. 
exas A survey carried on in the northeastern corner of this State, cover- 
ing Marion, Harrison, Henderson, Cherokee, Anderson, Smith, and Hop- 
kins Counties failed to show evidence cf the presence of this insect. 
