-28- 
Since the publication of Bulletin No. 71 of the Bureau of Entomology , 
several additional counties have been recorded, and many of the old locali- 
ties recorded in this publication were not confirmed by reports when the 
brood' appealed in 1911. 
It is very important that as complete a record as possible of the 
occurrence of this insect be made this spring. The distribution by States 
and counties as now recorded is as follows. The underlined counties are 
in addition to those reported in Entomology Bulletin ho. 71. Names in 
parentheses are those of towns, cities, and other localities. 
Connecticut. — Fairfield, Hartford, Litchfield, Middlesex, New Haven. 
District of Columbia. — Throughout. 
Illinois. — Be witt (Clinton, 1911), Livin gston (Fairbury, 1894), Mason 
"(1877). 
Indiana, — Dearborn, Posey? (Mt. Vernon, 1894), Fountain (Silvervood, 1911 i 
Maryland. — Anne Arundel, Calvert, Charles, Prince Georges, St. Marys, 
Montgomery (Glen Echo, 1911). 
Michigan. — Kalamazoo, Wayne (Detroit, in Woodmere Cemetery, 1894). 
New Jersey. '-- Entire State. 
New York. — Albany, Columbia, Dutchess, Chenango , ( Greene , 1894), Greene, 
Kings (Brooklyn^ .Prospect Park, 1894), New York (Bronx and 
Central Parks, 1894), Orange, Oswego (Oswego, 1894), Putnam, 
Rensselaer, Rockland, Saratoga, Suffolk (Huntington, 1894), 
Ulster, 'Washington, V/estchester, and on Staten Island and 
Long Island. 
North Carolina. — Alamance (Burlington, 1894), Bertie?, Davie 9 , Forsyth?, 
Guilford, Burke (Morgantown, 1894), Caldwell (Yadkin Valley?, 
\1877), Granville (1345 and 1360), Iredell (northwest corner 
of the county) , Orange, Rockingham, Rowan, Stokes, Surry, 
Wake?, r 'arren?, Yadkin?. 
Pennsylvania. — Berks, Bucks, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, 
Lebanon, Lehigh, Montgomery, Northampton, Philadelphia, Pike, 
Potter, Schuylkill, Wyoming. 
Tennessee. — Hamilton ( Chattanooga, 1394, newspaper report). 
